Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 7866  |
|  Benny Pedersen to Maurice Kinal  |
|  how many kernels must a penguin compile   |
|  26 Jul 23 07:45:42  |
 MSGID: 2:230/0 64c0d238 TZUTC: 0000 REPLY: 1:153/7001.2989 64c08f1b CHRS: LATIN-1 2 TID: hpt/lnx 1.9.0-cur 17-02-17 Hello Maurice! 26 Jul 2023 03:12, Maurice Kinal wrote to Benny Pedersen: MK> Which zenblead fixes? why do you ask me ? :=) MK> I just booted it up on this machine earlier MK> today but see little to no difference. then you possible are fine with zen3 or zen4 with dont have this bugs to be solved in ucode BP>> keep away from zen2 hardware is safe on its own MK> I am not convinced but it isn't like I can cite any unsafe behavior so MK> far. This machine is deploying a AMD Ryzen 7 5800U which if I am not MK> mistaken is a zen3. The Europoint is on a zen1 (AMD Ryzen Embedded MK> R1505G). I also have a zen2 but it is an Epyc and isn't part of the MK> fidonet mix. I am using it solely for R&D. does it say epyc in uname -a ? :) there exists zenbleed tarball that have tools to test if something is missing in ucode, i dont know if the ucode is part of kernel, but imho only 6.4.6 have zenbleed fix, not currently older kernels i still don't have any epyc cpu, so i am happy :=) MK> As for the www it is even more fsck'ed than it ever was. No surprises MK> there. I note many a site that won't support my webbrowser anymore MK> and it was probably the safest any browser ever is/was. Very sad MK> although I never really cared for the www so I wan't be missing it. MK> How about you? gopher is not well designed for roundcube webmail, lol :) i dont know if there exists webmail based on gopher protocol, i will let it be upto the reader to find why it does not work sadly dovecot have planed to support jmap, but so far only cyrus-imapd have it, on the other hand cyrus-imapd miss support for weakforced, it complicated for secureity, i could just make reject rules in iptables change to accept for a limited ip ranges where i have users, it would be rock solid, firewalls should be static rule set, not dynamic, and this is why i think fail2ban is designed for the incorrect problem Regards Benny ... too late to die young :) --- Msged/LNX 6.1.2 (Linux/6.4.6-gentoo-dist (x86_64)) * Origin: gopher://fido.junc.eu/ (2:230/0) SEEN-BY: 1/123 15/0 90/1 103/705 105/81 106/201 114/709 123/131 124/5016 SEEN-BY: 129/305 153/757 7715 154/10 201/0 203/0 124 412 218/700 221/0 SEEN-BY: 221/1 6 226/30 227/114 229/110 112 113 206 307 317 400 426 SEEN-BY: 229/428 452 470 550 616 664 700 230/0 240/1120 5832 266/512 SEEN-BY: 280/464 5003 282/1038 291/111 292/854 8125 301/1 113 812 SEEN-BY: 310/31 317/3 320/219 322/757 335/364 341/66 234 342/200 396/45 SEEN-BY: 423/120 460/58 256 1124 5858 633/280 712/848 770/1 5020/400 SEEN-BY: 5020/545 1042 5054/30 5075/35 PATH: 230/0 203/0 280/464 301/1 460/58 229/426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]