XPost: linux.debian.bugs.dist
From: josch@debian.org
Control: tag -1 + patch
Hi,
On Thu, 16 Oct 2025 15:17:57 +0200 Diederik de Haas
wrote:
> I tried if the following patch would fix it:
>
> ```
> diff --git a/debian/config/misc-nonfree/defines b/debian/confi
/misc-nonfree/defines
> index 71a7ae3..86ca756 100644
> --- a/debian/config/misc-nonfree/defines
> +++ b/debian/config/misc-nonfree/defines
> @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ files:
> 3com/typhoon.bin
> advansys/*
> amphion/vpu/*
> - arm/mali/arch10.8/mali_csffw.bin
> + arm/mali/*
> brcm/BCM-0a5c-6410.hcd
> brcm/BCM-0bb4-0306.hcd
> cadence/mhdp8546.bin
I tried this patch:
--- a/debian/config/misc-nonfree/defines
+++ b/debian/config/misc-nonfree/defines
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ files:
3com/typhoon.bin
advansys/*
amphion/vpu/*
- arm/mali/arch10.8/mali_csffw.bin
+ arm/mali/arch10.*/mali_csffw.bin
brcm/BCM-0a5c-6410.hcd
brcm/BCM-0bb4-0306.hcd
cadence/mhdp8546.bin
And with that, the resulting package (built on salsa) has:
drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2025-10-15 16:02 ./usr/lib/firmware/arm/
drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2025-10-15 16:02 ./usr/lib/firmware/arm/mali/
drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2025-10-15 16:02 ./usr/lib/firmwa
e/arm/mali/arch10.10/
-rw-r--r-- root/root 282624 2025-10-15 16:02 ./usr/lib/firmwa
e/arm/mali/arch10.10/mali_csffw.bin
drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2025-10-15 16:02 ./usr/lib/firmwa
e/arm/mali/arch10.12/
lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2025-10-15 16:02 ./usr/lib/firmwa
e/arm/mali/arch10.12/mali_csffw.bin -> ../arch10.10/mali_csffw.bin
drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2025-10-15 16:02 ./usr/lib/firmwa
e/arm/mali/arch10.8/
lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2025-10-15 16:02 ./usr/lib/firmwa
e/arm/mali/arch10.8/mali_csffw.bin -> ../arch10.10/mali_csffw.bin
I also wonder whether it would make sense to add some mechanism which would
check after dh_builddeb whether the created binary packages contain any
broken symlinks. Does a tool to do such a thing already exist? Lintian does
not warn about this (probably because the link target might come from one of
the Depends) and dh_missing also does not complain that some files do not get
installed.
Any ideas of how to prevent this sort of bug in the long-term?
Thanks!
cheers, josch
--==============Q69829973179211040=MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: signature
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"; c
arset="us-ascii"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=KMCP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
