home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   linux.debian.kernel      Debian kernel discussions      2,884 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 2,015 of 2,884   
   Salvatore Bonaccorso to Wolf   
   Bug#1120831: Acknowledgement (eslinux-im   
   20 Dec 25 13:50:01   
   
   XPost: linux.debian.bugs.dist   
   From: carnil@debian.org   
      
   Hi Wolf,   
      
   On Sat, Dec 20, 2025 at 08:46:43AM +0000, Wolf wrote:   
   >   
   > On Thursday, 18 December 2025 at 21:18, Salvatore Bonaccorso <   
   arnil@debian.org> wrote:   
   >   
   > >   
   >   
   > >   
   >   
   > > Hi Wolf,   
   > >   
   >   
   > > On Wed, Dec 17, 2025 at 10:57:21AM +0000, Wolf wrote:   
   > >   
   >   
   > > > On Wednesday, 17 December 2025 at 11:57, Salvatore Bonaccorso   
   carnil@debian.org wrote:   
   > > >   
   >   
   > > > > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo   
   > > >   
   >   
   > > > > Hi Wolf,   
   > > >   
   >   
   > > > > On Wed, Dec 10, 2025 at 05:12:57PM +0000, Wolf wrote:   
   > > >   
   >   
   > > > > > The error still appears with nvidia blacklisted.   
   > > >   
   >   
   > > > > Ok that is actually "great" now. Given you can reproduce the issue,   
   > > > > can you do the bisect work between the known good kernel and first bad   
   > > > > one?   
   > > >   
   >   
   > > > > Do you need instructions on how to do it?   
   > > >   
   >   
   > > > > Regards,   
   > > > > Salvatore   
   > > >   
   >   
   > > > Hi, Salvatore,   
   > > >   
   >   
   > > > Last good kernel I know is 6.16.12-1, which I'm using now (installed at   
   2025-10-13).   
   > > >   
   >   
   > > > All others are bad, starting with 6.17.6-1 (from 2025-11-02).   
   > > >   
   >   
   > > > I reported the bug only after I found 6.17.6-1, 6.17.7-1 and 6.17.8-1   
   bugged.   
   > >   
   >   
   > >   
   >   
   > > Is the issue present as well in 6.17.2-1~exp1 which was in   
   > > experimental? If yes then I suggest to do the following as next steps:   
   > >   
   >   
   > > Check upstream v6.16 directly and v6.17. The procedure can be as   
   > > follows:   
   > >   
   >   
   > > git clone https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/to   
   valds/linux.git   
   > > cd linux   
   > > git checkout v6.16   
   > > cp /boot/config-$(uname -r) .config   
   > > yes '' | make localmodconfig   
   > > make savedefconfig   
   > > mv defconfig arch/x86/configs/my_defconfig   
   > >   
   >   
   > > # test 6.16 to ensure this is "good"   
   > > make my_defconfig   
   > > make -j $(nproc) bindeb-pkg   
   > > ... install the resulting .deb package and confirm it successfully boots /   
   problem does not exist   
   > >   
   >   
   > > # test 6.17 to ensure this is "bad"   
   > > git checkout v6.17   
   > > make my_defconfig   
   > > make -j $(nproc) bindeb-pkg   
   > > ... install the resulting .deb package and confirm it fails to boot /   
   problem exists   
   > >   
   >   
   > > With that confirmed, the bisection can start:   
   > >   
   >   
   > > git bisect start   
   > > git bisect good v6.16   
   > > git bisect bad v6.17   
   > >   
   >   
   > > In each bisection step git checks out a state between the oldest   
   > > known-bad and the newest known-good commit. In each step test using:   
   > >   
   >   
   > > make my_defconfig   
   > > make -j $(nproc) bindeb-pkg   
   > > ... install, try to boot / verify if problem exists   
   > >   
   >   
   > > and if the problem is hit run:   
   > >   
   >   
   > > git bisect bad   
   > >   
   >   
   > > and if the problem doesn't trigger run:   
   > >   
   >   
   > > git bisect good   
   > >   
   >   
   > > . Please pay attention to always select the just built kernel for   
   > > booting, it won't always be the default kernel picked up by grub.   
   > >   
   >   
   > > Iterate until git announces to have identified the first bad commit.   
   > >   
   >   
   > > Then provide the output of   
   > >   
   >   
   > > git bisect log   
   > >   
   >   
   > > In the course of the bisection you might have to uninstall previous   
   > > kernels again to not exhaust the disk space in /boot. Also in the end   
   > > uninstall all self-built kernels again.   
   > >   
   >   
   > > This prodecure will lead us to a single commit ideally where the   
   > > problem starts. This would be needed to properly report the issue   
   > > upstream and together with upstream people understand what the problem   
   > > is.   
   > >   
   >   
   > > Regards,   
   > > Salvatore   
   >   
   > Hi, Salvatore,   
   >   
   > 6.17.2-1~exp1 is not yet available in SID.   
      
   No, it was a version in experimental, but those versions are   
   superseeded already, so the version need to be fetched from the   
   snapshot.debian.org service:   
      
   It can be fetched from https://snapshot.debian.org/package/linux   
   signed-amd64/6.17.2%2B1~exp1/   
      
   But once we have the more close range of versions the next step is the   
   bisect. I realize this is asking involving a couple of kernel   
   versions, but the above proceure should make it efficient enough.   
      
   Regards,   
   Salvatore   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca