Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    linux.debian.kernel    |    Debian kernel discussions    |    2,884 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,015 of 2,884    |
|    Salvatore Bonaccorso to Wolf    |
|    Bug#1120831: Acknowledgement (eslinux-im    |
|    20 Dec 25 13:50:01    |
      XPost: linux.debian.bugs.dist       From: carnil@debian.org              Hi Wolf,              On Sat, Dec 20, 2025 at 08:46:43AM +0000, Wolf wrote:       >       > On Thursday, 18 December 2025 at 21:18, Salvatore Bonaccorso <       arnil@debian.org> wrote:       >       > >       >       > >       >       > > Hi Wolf,       > >       >       > > On Wed, Dec 17, 2025 at 10:57:21AM +0000, Wolf wrote:       > >       >       > > > On Wednesday, 17 December 2025 at 11:57, Salvatore Bonaccorso       carnil@debian.org wrote:       > > >       >       > > > > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo       > > >       >       > > > > Hi Wolf,       > > >       >       > > > > On Wed, Dec 10, 2025 at 05:12:57PM +0000, Wolf wrote:       > > >       >       > > > > > The error still appears with nvidia blacklisted.       > > >       >       > > > > Ok that is actually "great" now. Given you can reproduce the issue,       > > > > can you do the bisect work between the known good kernel and first bad       > > > > one?       > > >       >       > > > > Do you need instructions on how to do it?       > > >       >       > > > > Regards,       > > > > Salvatore       > > >       >       > > > Hi, Salvatore,       > > >       >       > > > Last good kernel I know is 6.16.12-1, which I'm using now (installed at       2025-10-13).       > > >       >       > > > All others are bad, starting with 6.17.6-1 (from 2025-11-02).       > > >       >       > > > I reported the bug only after I found 6.17.6-1, 6.17.7-1 and 6.17.8-1       bugged.       > >       >       > >       >       > > Is the issue present as well in 6.17.2-1~exp1 which was in       > > experimental? If yes then I suggest to do the following as next steps:       > >       >       > > Check upstream v6.16 directly and v6.17. The procedure can be as       > > follows:       > >       >       > > git clone https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/to       valds/linux.git       > > cd linux       > > git checkout v6.16       > > cp /boot/config-$(uname -r) .config       > > yes '' | make localmodconfig       > > make savedefconfig       > > mv defconfig arch/x86/configs/my_defconfig       > >       >       > > # test 6.16 to ensure this is "good"       > > make my_defconfig       > > make -j $(nproc) bindeb-pkg       > > ... install the resulting .deb package and confirm it successfully boots /       problem does not exist       > >       >       > > # test 6.17 to ensure this is "bad"       > > git checkout v6.17       > > make my_defconfig       > > make -j $(nproc) bindeb-pkg       > > ... install the resulting .deb package and confirm it fails to boot /       problem exists       > >       >       > > With that confirmed, the bisection can start:       > >       >       > > git bisect start       > > git bisect good v6.16       > > git bisect bad v6.17       > >       >       > > In each bisection step git checks out a state between the oldest       > > known-bad and the newest known-good commit. In each step test using:       > >       >       > > make my_defconfig       > > make -j $(nproc) bindeb-pkg       > > ... install, try to boot / verify if problem exists       > >       >       > > and if the problem is hit run:       > >       >       > > git bisect bad       > >       >       > > and if the problem doesn't trigger run:       > >       >       > > git bisect good       > >       >       > > . Please pay attention to always select the just built kernel for       > > booting, it won't always be the default kernel picked up by grub.       > >       >       > > Iterate until git announces to have identified the first bad commit.       > >       >       > > Then provide the output of       > >       >       > > git bisect log       > >       >       > > In the course of the bisection you might have to uninstall previous       > > kernels again to not exhaust the disk space in /boot. Also in the end       > > uninstall all self-built kernels again.       > >       >       > > This prodecure will lead us to a single commit ideally where the       > > problem starts. This would be needed to properly report the issue       > > upstream and together with upstream people understand what the problem       > > is.       > >       >       > > Regards,       > > Salvatore       >       > Hi, Salvatore,       >       > 6.17.2-1~exp1 is not yet available in SID.              No, it was a version in experimental, but those versions are       superseeded already, so the version need to be fetched from the       snapshot.debian.org service:              It can be fetched from https://snapshot.debian.org/package/linux       signed-amd64/6.17.2%2B1~exp1/              But once we have the more close range of versions the next step is the       bisect. I realize this is asking involving a couple of kernel       versions, but the above proceure should make it efficient enough.              Regards,       Salvatore              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca