Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    linux.debian.kernel    |    Debian kernel discussions    |    2,884 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,050 of 2,884    |
|    Salvatore Bonaccorso to Ivan    |
|    Bug#1123975: Regression: system fails to    |
|    25 Dec 25 22:40:01    |
      XPost: linux.debian.bugs.dist       From: carnil@debian.org              Control: reassign -1 src:linux 6.1.158-1       Control: tags -1 + moreinfo              On Thu, Dec 25, 2025 at 12:18:30PM +0100, Ivan wrote:       > Package: linux-image-amd64       > Version: 6.1.158-1       > Severity: normal       > X-Debbugs-Cc: kontra@tutamail.com       >       > Dear Maintainer,       >       > What led up to the situation?       > The system was updated from a working kernel linux-image-6.1.0-37-amd64       > to linux-image-6.1.0-41-amd64 as part of a normal system upgrade.       >       > What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)?       > After upgrading to linux-image-6.1.0-41-amd64 the system became unstable       > during early boot. Reinstalling the same kernel package did not fix the       issue.       > Downgrading back to linux-image-6.1.0-37-amd64 restored normal operation.       >       > What was the outcome of this action?       > With linux-image-6.1.0-41-amd64 the system fails to boot reliably and shows       > early boot/initramfs related issues. With linux-image-6.1.0-37-amd64 the       > system works correctly.       >       > What outcome did you expect instead?       > The system should boot normally with linux-image-6.1.0-41-amd64, as it did       > with the previous kernel version.              We need more information here on what is failing. Can you boot (in       case not yet configured as such) without quiet kernel parameter and       get the information where the boot fails? What are the messages       printed on the console? Ideally you record those completely via       netconsole.              Another thing to do is, since you it seems to fail reliably with the       broken version, can you bisect the changes please between 6.1.140-1       and 6.1.158-1.              Given there were as well a couple of released Debian versions between       6.1.140-1 and 6.1.158-1 please do isolate the range of Debian       revisions where the boot failure starts.              The released versions were:              6.1.158-1       6.1.153-1       6.1.148-1       6.1.147-1       6.1.140-1              so first bisect those versions to understand which caused the problem.       Let's hypotetically assume it still boots with 6.1.153-1 but fails       with 6.1.158-1, then it would be great if you can do the bisect       stating here. That would involve involve compiling and testing a few       kernels.               git clone --single-branch -b linux-6.1.y https://git.kernel.       rg/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git        cd linux-stable        git checkout v6.1.153        cp /boot/config-$(uname -r) .config        yes '' | make localmodconfig        make savedefconfig        mv defconfig arch/x86/configs/my_defconfig               # test 6.1.153 to ensure this is "good"        make my_defconfig        make -j $(nproc) bindeb-pkg        ... install the resulting .deb package and confirm it successfully boots               # test 6.1.158 to ensure this is "bad"        git checkout v6.1.158        make my_defconfig        make -j $(nproc) bindeb-pkg        ... install the resulting .deb package and confirm it fails to boot              With that confirmed, the bisection can start:               git bisect start        git bisect good v6.1.153        git bisect bad v6.1.158              In each bisection step git checks out a state between the oldest       known-bad and the newest known-good commit. In each step test using:               make my_defconfig        make -j $(nproc) bindeb-pkg        ... install, try to boot / verify if problem exists              and if the problem is hit run:               git bisect bad              and if the problem doesn't trigger run:               git bisect good              . Please pay attention to always select the just built kernel for       booting, it won't always be the default kernel picked up by grub.              Iterate until git announces to have identified the first bad commit.              Then provide the output of               git bisect log              In the course of the bisection you might have to uninstall previous       kernels again to not exhaust the disk space in /boot. Also in the end       uninstall all self-built kernels again.              Let us know please the results.              One additional thing, your kernel is tained with proprietary modules,       which are tose? Please do the bisect experiments as well without       involving those to make it possible to generate a upstream report.              Did you had sufficient space in /boot?              Regards,       Salvatore              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca