home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   linux.debian.kernel      Debian kernel discussions      2,884 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 2,205 of 2,884   
   Pascal Hambourg to All   
   Bug#1124667: linux-image-6.18.3-1 only a   
   06 Jan 26 16:50:02   
   
   XPost: linux.debian.bugs.dist   
   From: pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org   
      
   On Mon, 5 Jan 2026 13:05:59 +0100 Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:   
   > On Mon, Jan 05, 2026 at 11:10:22AM +0100, Roland Clobus wrote:   
   >>   
   >> The package linux-image-amd64 for 6.18.3-1 depends only on the signed kernel   
   >> package [1]. At this moment the signed version is (not yet?) available, so   
   >> the installation will fail.   
   >>   
   >> For sid, the source package appears to have been changed from   
   >> 'linux-signed-amd64' to 'linux'. Could that be causing this issue?   
      
   I guess so. What is the reason of this change ?   
      
   >> Would it be possible to change the dependency to:   
   >> linux-image-6.18.3+deb14-amd64 | linux-image-6.18.3+deb14-amd64-unsigned   
   >> instead?   
      
   Not sure it is a good idea. It could lead to the installation of an   
   unsigned kernel while a signed kernel was expected. This would make the   
   system unbootable with secure boot.   
      
   > This is normal for short while. FTP master will need to trigger the   
   > codesigning service, at which point then we will get the signed images   
   > as well.   
      
   Is it really normal to update the kernel meta-package before the signed   
   kernel package the new version depends on is available ?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca