XPost: linux.debian.bugs.dist   
   From: pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org   
      
   On 06/01/2026 at 20:45, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:   
   >>   
   >> Is it really normal to update the kernel meta-package before the signed   
   >> kernel package the new version depends on is available ?   
   >   
   > I was I think bit prematurely to close the issue, because I think we   
   > should explain from where the change come (and if we actually want to   
   > cause this situation).   
   >   
   > If I'm correct, with the change af3f11740ed9 ("Introduce a base   
   > package for version sync") we now generate again the linux-image-*   
   > packages from src:linux.   
   >   
   >   [1] https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/commit/af3f   
   1740ed9525b0c035f941c86ddc5e10125bb   
      
   Thank you for the explanation. I understand the goal (keep installed   
   linux-image and linux-headers versions in sync)) and subscribe to it,   
   but do linux-image-{amd64,arm64} meta-packages have to be built from   
   src:linux instead of src:linux-signed-{amd64,arm64} for this ?   
      
   ("It makes things simpler and sid should stand this kind of transient   
   situation" is an acceptable answer)   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)