Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    linux.debian.kernel    |    Debian kernel discussions    |    2,884 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,517 of 2,884    |
|    Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues to All    |
|    Re: [RFC] Reorganizing Linux packages    |
|    31 Jan 26 18:30:01    |
      From: josch@debian.org              Hi,              Quoting Ben Hutchings (2025-09-08 22:11:40)       > On Sat, 2025-08-30 at 13:00 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:       > > [Cc apt maintainers, as this interacts with the versioned package       > > support, reply-to kernel maintainers]       > >        > > Hi       > >        > > This is the plan to re-organize the Linux packages a bit, or maybe a       > > lot.       > >        > > The goals are:       > > - Move packaged files out of `/boot`       > > - Replace extra cloud build with stripped down variant of the normal       > > build       > > - Prepare for pre-built initramfs and/or UKI       > > - Remove hard dependency between headers and (bootable) image       >        > I generally agree with these goals, but I would like to see how this is       > done.       >        > [...]       > > ### Split modules out of `linux-image` package       > >        > > Like the other distributions we should move all the modules into it's own       > > package, `linux-modules`. We can then split this new package further in a       > > later change.       >        > Let's not go too far with this. Managing the current splitting of       > modules into udebs already takes significant time (and seems to be       > largely unnecessary).              a version with this split was uploaded to experimental 3 weeks ago and I just       got around testing it. After having spent the day with fixing the software in       and outside of Debian that I maintain which broke after the split of modules       and dtbs into other packages I wonder:              What is the motivation of the split other than "other distros do it"? The       changelog only says "Split kernel modules into own package" but doesn't give a       rationale. Is one written down somewhere?              Thanks!              cheers, josch       --==============V46105544730346592=MIME-Version: 1.0       Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit       Content-Description: signature       Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"; c       arset="us-ascii"              -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----              iQIzBAABCgAdFiEElFhU6KL81LF4wVq58sulx4+9g+EFAml+OtYACgkQ8sulx4+9       g+EW5w/+OAbhv8iEh2FlE7YpmS/IkUlxV+bflvwm+Iwp/Sa+jyob6xzcXTMXTD3V       D+Nc8YsYnJpQVaAkEeO0be51/L9/UuqnJ0bOoBbNPKdP0zsgmYiRq8HBWSbmV+fU       uEgq2bxOY7K/sSfZ5GNWd8b+aMEqQXyAtpU+IrjY3P8ejLm9zO/YX4jrCZ4GI3FT       tbM6SPRKeTRpNouBogF1x5+JbReOlL+jCYKkSTxlsgEhSxZbik9o9j7Toe/RnFKj       3EY7kR+cuMtGNMyqTswftBoW7yqKT6HXbGFN0drlUDBHVUS3Si03Bs4l8A4NPX8i       QIQbQvk0hk3rh1Hdexk/eGmtooJfmIadxXiUbw0QK0H4QquQ0jrNMFow09h4+YwF       76Q4/32cOYjIpxK8Y8UjSKgXsaPNvTeFPOkUA2+iu67uTA8cEbJZr7kWQ8/Slqar       EjE3MJm9oUubPa8PXpqhW8KzpkUt+aP9nx4Dqb0O1xWu4aLkfAlcmJk6exHkhrIZ       6hCEWcLjFH6QjjW4/MrbWO9SPIJypZs3DIgJFYs3755JwMt36eofU9xtPEuuZRYz       tTyNC5ofGpprrRt3Otl/kXK28yqUCY4Wzm1sYXRkwWpjedPfI7iCeZC2MFy0MBuI       Ii111VHr/oqmoxsPrlL6U6bROdkBCHQSdXiSTAWIvGEnSNGc3mM=       =YrR4       -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca