home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   linux.debian.kernel      Debian kernel discussions      2,884 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 2,517 of 2,884   
   Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues to All   
   Re: [RFC] Reorganizing Linux packages   
   31 Jan 26 18:30:01   
   
   From: josch@debian.org   
      
   Hi,   
      
   Quoting Ben Hutchings (2025-09-08 22:11:40)   
   > On Sat, 2025-08-30 at 13:00 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:   
   > > [Cc apt maintainers, as this interacts with the versioned package   
   > > support, reply-to kernel maintainers]   
   > >    
   > > Hi   
   > >    
   > > This is the plan to re-organize the Linux packages a bit, or maybe a   
   > > lot.   
   > >    
   > > The goals are:   
   > > - Move packaged files out of `/boot`   
   > > - Replace extra cloud build with stripped down variant of the normal   
   > >   build   
   > > - Prepare for pre-built initramfs and/or UKI   
   > > - Remove hard dependency between headers and (bootable) image   
   >    
   > I generally agree with these goals, but I would like to see how this is   
   > done.   
   >    
   > [...]   
   > > ### Split modules out of `linux-image` package   
   > >    
   > > Like the other distributions we should move all the modules into it's own   
   > > package, `linux-modules`.  We can then split this new package further in a   
   > > later change.   
   >    
   > Let's not go too far with this.  Managing the current splitting of   
   > modules into udebs already takes significant time (and seems to be   
   > largely unnecessary).   
      
   a version with this split was uploaded to experimental 3 weeks ago and I just   
   got around testing it. After having spent the day with fixing the software in   
   and outside of Debian that I maintain which broke after the split of modules   
   and dtbs into other packages I wonder:   
      
   What is the motivation of the split other than "other distros do it"? The   
   changelog only says "Split kernel modules into own package" but doesn't give a   
   rationale. Is one written down somewhere?   
      
   Thanks!   
      
   cheers, josch   
   --==============V46105544730346592=MIME-Version: 1.0   
   Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit   
   Content-Description: signature   
   Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"; c   
   arset="us-ascii"   
      
   -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----   
      
   iQIzBAABCgAdFiEElFhU6KL81LF4wVq58sulx4+9g+EFAml+OtYACgkQ8sulx4+9   
   g+EW5w/+OAbhv8iEh2FlE7YpmS/IkUlxV+bflvwm+Iwp/Sa+jyob6xzcXTMXTD3V   
   D+Nc8YsYnJpQVaAkEeO0be51/L9/UuqnJ0bOoBbNPKdP0zsgmYiRq8HBWSbmV+fU   
   uEgq2bxOY7K/sSfZ5GNWd8b+aMEqQXyAtpU+IrjY3P8ejLm9zO/YX4jrCZ4GI3FT   
   tbM6SPRKeTRpNouBogF1x5+JbReOlL+jCYKkSTxlsgEhSxZbik9o9j7Toe/RnFKj   
   3EY7kR+cuMtGNMyqTswftBoW7yqKT6HXbGFN0drlUDBHVUS3Si03Bs4l8A4NPX8i   
   QIQbQvk0hk3rh1Hdexk/eGmtooJfmIadxXiUbw0QK0H4QquQ0jrNMFow09h4+YwF   
   76Q4/32cOYjIpxK8Y8UjSKgXsaPNvTeFPOkUA2+iu67uTA8cEbJZr7kWQ8/Slqar   
   EjE3MJm9oUubPa8PXpqhW8KzpkUt+aP9nx4Dqb0O1xWu4aLkfAlcmJk6exHkhrIZ   
   6hCEWcLjFH6QjjW4/MrbWO9SPIJypZs3DIgJFYs3755JwMt36eofU9xtPEuuZRYz   
   tTyNC5ofGpprrRt3Otl/kXK28yqUCY4Wzm1sYXRkwWpjedPfI7iCeZC2MFy0MBuI   
   Ii111VHr/oqmoxsPrlL6U6bROdkBCHQSdXiSTAWIvGEnSNGc3mM=   
   =YrR4   
   -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca