From: owner@bugs.debian.org   
      
   This is a multi-part message in MIME format...   
      
   Your message dated Fri, 13 Feb 2026 13:38:17 +0000   
   with message-id    
   and subject line Bug#1122785: fixed in wireless-regdb 2026.02.04-1   
   has caused the Debian Bug report #1122785,   
   regarding wireless-regdb: Please remove/replace usage of dh_movetousr   
   to be marked as done.   
      
   This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.   
   If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the   
   Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.   
      
   (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this   
   message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system   
   misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org   
   immediately.)   
      
      
   --    
   1122785: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1122785   
   Debian Bug Tracking System   
   Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems   
      
   Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Dec 2025 13:59:41 +0000   
   X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02   
    (2024-03-25) on buxtehude.debian.org   
   X-Spam-Level:   
   X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FOURLA,FROMDEVELOPER,   
    HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_SBLXBL,RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS,   
    SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no   
    version=4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02   
   X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 4; hammy, 141; neutral, 45; spammy, 1.   
    spammytokens:0.951-+--our hammytokens:0.000-+--bookworm,   
    0.000-+--H*F:U*biebl, 0.000-+--forky, 0.000-+--H*rp:D*michaelbiebl.de,   
    0.000-+--U*helmutg   
   Return-path:    
   Received: from dd51734.kasserver.com ([85.13.156.41]:35154)   
    by buxtehude.debian.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_P   
   S_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256)   
    (Exim 4.96)   
    (envelope-from )   
    id 1vU3gK-00DgkI-2X   
    for maintonly@bugs.debian.org;   
    Fri, 12 Dec 2025 13:59:40 +0000   
   Received: from mars.milchstrasse.xx (i5E86B6D5.versanet.de [94.134.182.213])   
    by dd51734.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 33E0DDC00C0E   
    for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2025 14:52:23 +0100 (CET)   
   Received: by mars.milchstrasse.xx (Postfix, from userid 1000)   
    id 147CB96052D; Fri, 12 Dec 2025 14:52:18 +0100 (CET)   
   From: biebl@debian.org   
   To: maintonly@bugs.debian.org   
   Subject: wireless-regdb: Please remove/replace usage of dh_movetousr   
   Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2025 14:52:18 +0100   
   X-Generator: mass-bug from devscripts 2.25.30   
   Message-Id: <20251212135218.147CB96052D@mars.milchstrasse.xx>   
   X-Spamd-Bar: /   
   Delivered-To: maintonly@bugs.debian.org   
      
   Source: wireless-regdb   
   Version: 2025.10.07-1   
   Severity: normal   
   User: helmutg@debian.org   
   Usertags: dh_movetousr_removal   
      
   Hi,   
      
   your package wireless-regdb either Build-Depends on   
   dh-sequence-movetousr or uses dh_movetousr conditionally to move   
   files from aliased locations like /sbin, /bin or /lib to the   
   canonical location in /usr.   
      
   Eventually, we would like to get rid of this debhelper addon.   
   Packages should use the canonical paths without any postprocessing.   
      
   This means, files are installed directly into /usr.   
      
   Please note, that such a change must not be backported to bookworm or   
   older. If you intend to provide such backports, these changes must be   
   reverted for those releases. If this means an undue burden on your   
   workflow our recommendation is to postpone this cleanup.   
      
   The motivation for this bug report is, to inform maintainers, that   
   installing files into the canonical location explicitly, is now the   
   preferred approach and dh_movetousr is now a deprecated tool.   
      
   The goal is, to have dh_movetousr removed after forky is released. We   
   can revise this plan, if needed. Please keep this timeline in mind   
   and let us know if this doesn't work for you.   
      
   For more information see [1].   
      
   If you have further questions, there is an IRC channel named   
   #debian-usrmerge on OFTC.   
      
   Regards,   
      
   Michael   
      
   [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2025/11/msg00245.html   
      
   Received: (at 1122785-close) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Feb 2026 13:38:21 +0000   
   X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02   
    (2024-03-25) on buxtehude.debian.org   
   X-Spam-Level:   
   X-Spam-Status: No, score=-113.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,   
    DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FOURLA,FVGT_m_MULTI_ODD,   
    HAS_BUG_NUMBER,MD5_SHA1_SUM,PGPSIGNATURE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,   
    SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NONE,USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST autolearn=ham   
    autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02   
   X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 115; hammy, 150; neutral, 165; spammy,   
    0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--HX-Debian:DAK,   
    0.000-+--H*rp:D*ftp-master.debian.org, 0.000-+--HX-DAK:process-upload,   
    0.000-+--UD:debian.tar.xz, 0.000-+--H*RU:sk:fasolo.   
   Return-path:    
   Received: from mitropoulos.debian.org ([2001:648:2ffc:deb:216:61   
   f:fe9d:958d]:45352)   
    by buxtehude.debian.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RS   
   _PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256)   
    (Exim 4.96)   
    (envelope-from )   
    id 1vqtNF-007Qtl-2x   
    for 1122785-close@bugs.debian.org;   
    Fri, 13 Feb 2026 13:38:21 +0000   
   Received: from [192.91.235.231] (port=59994 helo=fasolo.debian.org)   
    from C=NA,ST=NA,L=Ankh Morpork,O=Debian SMTP,OU=Debian SMTP CA,   
   N=fasolo.debian.org,EMAIL=hostmaster@fasolo.debian.org (verified)   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|