Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    linux.debian.kernel    |    Debian kernel discussions    |    2,884 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,825 of 2,884    |
|    Uwe =?utf-8?Q?Kleine-K=C3=B6nig?= to gregg    |
|    Re: Bug#1127688: linux-image-6.18.9+deb1    |
|    21 Feb 26 16:40:01    |
      XPost: linux.debian.bugs.dist       From: ukleinek@debian.org              Control: tag -1 + moreinfo              Hello,              On Wed, Feb 11, 2026 at 05:52:49PM +0000, gregg wrote:       > [279753.808435] Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical       address 0xfeffffff9286f8b0: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI              This looks like a bitflip, the address used should probably be 0       ffffffff9286f8b0.              Is this problem reproducible for you? Does it always happen on the same       address? Is that a regression (i.e. earlier kernels work fine)?              Can you run a memtest on your machine please? (Install memtest86+ and       boot into it.)              Best regards       Uwe              -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----              iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEP4GsaTp6HlmJrf7Tj4D7WH0S/k4FAmmZ0F4ACgkQj4D7WH0S       /k7c0gf+KSSK6cuTJhHiLjICPSRloxeDMRE96yy8HiqCtNC9S/NdiY0uEcV7ZFCp       HHz1KroTPwrQ7M5KM/AZlZlY7u/JrFUn3jPlNr/JqwEclriSt0l6rEGsCnVdXen8       RPfxrpGInnxiu7s2F1fvIwv/4ri/r58yFtlyh1A8Qqq9bbCfj4zkbZwhV+80UNIZ       Rwcuw+tkTCXKMASKWfpU8p/rJ6sp5WASW3LwyVPTt1YsFGS11Pg4pD8S8Od0Lyqp       uH95BkMofxR3F9BZhhoO+9MEPQ0A1sLdrzNECJ2j992uCE/24fP8pwHuGZgPFJ9k       vJ4RxQS/4fPg5ZPUZpwmfeKZoIfcDA==       =dMzN       -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca