XPost: linux.debian.ports.68k   
   From: glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de   
      
   Source: binutils   
   Version: 2.46-1   
   Severity: normal   
   User: debian-68k@lists.debian.org   
   Usertags: m68k   
   X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-68k@lists.debian.org   
      
   Hello,   
      
   I built binutils_2.45.90.20260201-1 on m68k on mitchy.debian.net and ran   
   into the following regressions:   
      
   Test results, compared with installed binutils:   
   W: [ld-bootstrap/bootstrap.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): bootstrap   
   W: [ld-bootstrap/bootstrap.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): bootstrap with   
   -Wl,--traditional-format   
   W: [ld-bootstrap/bootstrap.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): bootstrap with   
   -Wl,--no-keep-memory   
   W: [ld-bootstrap/bootstrap.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): bootstrap with   
   -Wl,--relax   
   W: [ld-bootstrap/bootstrap.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): bootstrap with   
   -Wl,--max-cache-size=-1   
   W: [ld-bootstrap/bootstrap.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): bootstrap with   
   -Wl,-z,nosectionheader   
   6 REGRESSIONS (0.21%).   
   2829 tests: 2704 pass (95.58%), 28 fail (0.99%), 7 xfail (0.25%) 3 untested   
   (0.11%).   
      
   Can you please update the list of ignored failures or do we need report these?   
      
   I'm trying to build binutils manually on m68k until the expect problem is   
   resolved.   
      
   Thanks,   
   Adrian   
      
   --   
    .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz   
   : :' :  Debian Developer   
   `. `'   Physicist   
     `-    GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)