Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    linux.debian.bugs.dist    |    Ohh some weird Debian bug report thing    |    28,835 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 27,062 of 28,835    |
|    C. W. to All    |
|    Bug#1121917: apparmor: Kernel version ou    |
|    10 Feb 26 15:00:01    |
      From: cw@aon.at              Package: apparmor       Version: 4.1.3-1       Followup-For: Bug #1121917       X-Debbugs-Cc: cw@aon.at              Hello,              It's this commit here:       https://gitlab.com/apparmor/apparmor/-/commit/7564cf01bb9a4c53cd       1ae2462e9d2005958ba44              Also known as 3748ecd7d8d1a04c12803d38b99bdc2f95d2286b in the master branch              I'm not aware of any stock profile that fails to load. But given that kind of       bug, I have no idea if the generated binary profiles might have some other       problems that might lead to eg. wrong rule behaviour.              cw                     -- System Information:       Debian Release: forky/sid        APT prefers unstable        APT policy: (500, 'unstable')       Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)              Kernel: Linux 6.18.8+deb14-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU threads; PREEMPT)       Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE,        AINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE       Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not       set       Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash       Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)       LSM: AppArmor: enabled              Versions of packages apparmor depends on:       ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.91       ii libc6 2.42-11+b1              apparmor recommends no packages.              Versions of packages apparmor suggests:       pn apparmor-profiles-extra |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca