Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    linux.debian.bugs.dist    |    Ohh some weird Debian bug report thing    |    28,835 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 27,139 of 28,835    |
|    Thomas Dickey to Vincent Lefevre    |
|    Bug#1072237: #1072237 libutempter: integ    |
|    11 Feb 26 01:30:01    |
      From: dickey@invisible-island.net              On Wed, Feb 11, 2026 at 01:13:05AM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:       > On 2026-02-10 18:38:10 -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:       > > On Tue, Feb 10, 2026 at 11:59:38PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:       > > > On 2026-02-10 17:06:48 -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:       > > > > utempter uses setgid, while systemd (whose documentation is per-line of       > > > > code no better than utempter) appears to require root privilege       > > > > (which of course is a big step backwards).       > > >        > > > As I understand the doc, software should not call systemd directly,       > > > but should use PAM, and more specifically, pam_systemd:       > > >        > > > pam_systemd - Register user sessions in the systemd login manager       > > >        > > > Then, concerning the needed permissions, isn't this controlled by       > > > PAM configuration?       > >        > > presumably - but ultimately it's a matter of authentication.       > > How do you suppose xterm would accomplish that?       >        > I don't know how this works, but I'm wondering why you mentioned       > authentication. The only thing that should be used concerning the       > user is the PID of the process.              man pam:               pam - Pluggable Authentication Modules Library              ...              DESCRIPTION        PAM is a system of libraries that handle the authentication tasks of        applications (services) on the system. The library provides a stable        general interface (Application Programming Interface - API) that        privilege granting programs (such as login(1) and su(1)) defer to to        perform standard authentication tasks.              I'd suppose PAM wants more than a process-id,       and am asking how you suppose that could be accomplished.              --        Thomas E. Dickey |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca