home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   linux.debian.bugs.dist      Ohh some weird Debian bug report thing      28,835 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 27,156 of 28,835   
   marillat to mjt@tls.msk.ru   
   Bug#1127622: libwinpr3-3: trying to over   
   11 Feb 26 09:10:02   
   
   From: marillat@christian.marillat.net   
      
   On Wed, 11 Feb 2026 09:51:13 +0300 Michael Tokarev  wrote:   
      
   [...]   
      
      
   > > > I probably should conflict with libwinpr2-2 package here, but even   
   > > > there, libwinpr2-2 is not part of trixie.  And trixie release notes   
   > > > states to remove obsolete packages.  If that package is there, it   
   > > > means the user didn't follow the release notes.  So even if the bug   
   > > > might be there, it's definitely of less severity.   
      
   Severity should be serious.   
      
   > > > I'm adding a Replaces for the non-t64 package.  I've no idea where   
   > > > you've got the t64 one.   
   > >   
   > > From Debian :   
   >  > ,----   
   >  > | $ rmadison freerdp2   
   >  > | freerdp2   | 2.3.0+dfsg1-2+deb11u1  | oldoldstable       | source   
   >  > | freerdp2   | 2.3.0+dfsg1-2+deb11u1  | oldoldstable-debug | source   
   >  > | freerdp2   | 2.11.7+dfsg1-6~deb12u1 | oldstable          | source   
      
   > Sure.  Please read what I wrote.  I especially noted libwinpr2-2t64   
   > variant, the t64 suffix, - this is what prompted me to think about   
   > ubuntu. t64 had happened after bookworm, for trixie, there were no   
   > libwinpr2-2t64 in oldstable, only libwinpr2-2 (without the t64 suffix).   
      
   > I'm fixing that by replacing both variants of libwinpr2-2, just in case   
   > someone installed a mix of stable and testing packages, but it it is   
   > still a bug of a low severity, since the user clearly did something that   
   > is not recommended.   
      
   > It would be interesting to know how you ended up having libwinpr2-2t64   
   > (with the t64 suffix) on an oldstable system.   
      
   Again from Debian. 2.11.7+dfsg1-6 has been packaged in Debian oldstable.   
      
   I am not the only one.   
      
   https://snapshot.debian.org/binary/libwinpr2-2t64/   
      
   ,----   
   | Binary package libwinpr2-2t64   
   |   
   | Available versions:   
   |   
   |     2.11.7+dfsg1-6 (source: freerdp2 2.11.7+dfsg1-6)   
   |     2.11.7+dfsg1-5 (source: freerdp2 2.11.7+dfsg1-5)   
   |     2.11.7+dfsg1-4 (source: freerdp2 2.11.7+dfsg1-4)   
   |     2.11.7+dfsg1-3 (source: freerdp2 2.11.7+dfsg1-3)   
   |     2.11.7+dfsg1-2 (source: freerdp2 2.11.7+dfsg1-2)   
   |     2.11.7+dfsg1-1 (source: freerdp2 2.11.7+dfsg1-1)   
   |     2.11.5+dfsg1-1 (source: freerdp2 2.11.5+dfsg1-1)   
   |     2.11.2+dfsg1-1.1~exp2 (source: freerdp2 2.11.2+dfsg1-1.1~exp2)   
   |     2.11.2+dfsg1-1.1~exp1 (source: freerdp2 2.11.2+dfsg1-1.1~exp1)   
   `----   
      
   Christian   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca