Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    linux.debian.bugs.dist    |    Ohh some weird Debian bug report thing    |    28,835 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 27,545 of 28,835    |
|    Andreas Tille to All    |
|    Bug#1127851: libodb-sqlite: New upstream    |
|    14 Feb 26 08:20:01    |
      From: tille@debian.org              Hi László,              thanks again for your always prompt response. This is really appreciated.              Am Sat, Feb 14, 2026 at 07:34:01AM +0100 schrieb László Böszörményi (GCS):       > > The bug reports were the result of a rather       > > broad scan for packages with long-standing upstream updates and missing       > > Salsa repositories. It just happened to affect some of your packages.       > Yup, I have several packages where upstream is dead, upgrading would       > need a lot of effort, etc. I keep them in the archives, even if       > usually I think I should have asked for their removal.              I've checked popcon before sending the bug reports of the two related       packages. Its not amazing but I've seen packages with less usage that       make sense inside Debian. Its hard for somebody who is not the       maintainer to ask for removal. If you think its better to remove it       and file a RoM bug yourself this is a different situation.              > Salsa and the appearance of team maintenance may just shadow that a       > package is no longer maintained for some reason. Would you find odb if       > it's already on Salsa?              Well, my query contain some "not on Salsa" condition so this would not       have been in the result set. Based on my experience in the Bug of the       Day initiative I simply made the experience that packages in Salsa are       easier accessible for newcomers. Since this belongs to my goals as DPL       I'm seeking for sensible ways to involve newcomers. I do not think that       this specific set of packages is contributing to this goal much. Its       rather about consistency inside the whole distribution.              > > What I could imagine doing in any case is:       > > * migrating the current packaging to Salsa in its present state,       > > * documenting the upstream changes and the build2 transition in a       > > README.source, so that any interested contributor has the relevant       > > information readily available.       > That sounds viable. If you have time for this, please do so.              Thank you for the permission. I will do so once time permits.              Thanks again for your cooperation        Andreas.              --       https://fam-tille.de              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca