From: nilesh@debian.org   
      
   I just stumbled on this bug report-   
      
   > I wrote an analysis on the bug last year, but in summary I believe this   
   GNU-specific construct:   
   > %:   
   >	dh $@   
   > is equivalent to   
   > .DEFAULT:   
   >	dh $@   
      
   While this is technically correct, is there a reason that you do not wish to   
   use "%"?   
   I ran a search [1] and I don't see even a single package in the archive that   
   uses .DEFAULT rule.   
      
   Hence I am unsure if adding this is resulting in any advantage here.   
      
   [1] https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=.DEFAULT+path%3Adebia   
   %2Frules&literal=1   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)