From: broonie@debian.org   
      
   On Sun, Feb 15, 2026 at 09:39:06AM +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote:   
      
   > Then, I went on to diff the relevant versions. Would there be a chance   
   > to use a public version constrol system for zlib maintenance? I found   
   > this:   
      
   I did have the package in revision control for a while but it just made   
   the whole experience of working on it miserable and I never saw any   
   indication that anyone had ever tried to interact with it or any of my   
   other packages so I stopped bothering, I was getting negative benefit   
   from it.  Every time I've tried poking at it the tooling was slow and   
   unpleasant to work on with patching systems since it tended to be hard   
   to tell what state things were in or generally work on changes to the   
   actual code (as opposed to packaging).  For stuff that's just pure   
   packaging it's fine, but sadly we need patches for zlib.   
      
   > This is an unfortunate mistake originating from Aurelien's patch for   
   > s390 removal. Shit happens. Here is a fix.   
      
   Thanks.   
      
   -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----   
      
   iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAmmTMbYACgkQJNaLcl1U   
   h9CmVwf9FFrgiDnx31zRP7g50KFOIev3CjwNNnrvVEpR1HztVMk99jwthOE+AuQ+   
   io8iIl3sIIQwrgwUe4PnYHmY6r9bUbY7TEAZ5b8UmQPjz4Xz7fUxWVtAFpJeZGT9   
   xdx97PoGg1qEcY6bP3fEyB0IrNyrmoNixw2Gja9qoj/AxDFNE4jWeaEFBB0zPZ7p   
   Gz5oNYf09kjQb3zV0PxHtJSqT5CJegztcxSXxu87lJuebi3fyueU0V8h7R9hrAZd   
   23/mEKmExXLEhTY1UHx79sVc8NLkSo4v9Rv4KQpw+3ZmfMKDWwl3ctkT1X42rTlp   
   V5eEbvhTLjGprGIoFhKBvKHDA+Bg2A==   
   =+4kW   
   -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)