From: tille@debian.org   
      
   Source: nsxiv   
   Version: 33-1   
   Severity: normal   
   X-Debbugs-Cc: Daniel Echeverry , 1082303@bugs.debian.org,   
   Package Salvaging Team    
      
   Hi,   
      
   when checking bug #1082303 I realised that it seems we have kind of a   
   decision about the prefered fork for sxiv.  If it is really a drop   
   in replacement it should feature some   
      
      Provides: sxiv   
      
   and use the alternatives mechanism to provide the binary.  This can   
   be later become   
      
      Replaces: sxiv   
      Conflicts: sxiv   
      
   in case we might decide to remove sxiv and nsxiv would provide the same   
   executable name.  For sure this is up for discussion but by opening this   
   bug report I would like to create a place where this can be discussed.   
      
   Kind regards   
      Andreas.   
      
   -- System Information:   
   Debian Release: forky/sid   
     APT prefers testing   
     APT policy: (501, 'testing'), (50, 'buildd-unstable'), (50, 'unstable'), (5,   
   'experimental'), (1, 'buildd-experimental')   
   Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)   
      
   Kernel: Linux 6.17.13+deb14-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads; PREEMPT)   
   Kernel taint flags: TAINT_CPU_OUT_OF_SPEC   
   Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8),    
   ANGUAGE=de_DE:de   
   Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash   
   Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)   
   LSM: AppArmor: enabled   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)