Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 618  |
|  Dan Clough to Oli  |
|  Re: Time limits  |
|  07 May 20 11:06:00  |
 TZUTC: -0500 MSGID: 141.fido_linuxbbs@1:123/115 23196ba5 REPLY: 2:280/464.47@fidonet 5eb3f7bf PID: Synchronet 3.18a-Linux May 1 2020 GCC 5.5.0 TID: SBBSecho 3.11-Linux r3.171 May 1 2020 GCC 5.5.0 CHRS: ASCII 1 -=> Oli wrote to Ali Mans <=- AM> Hi, I'm quite new in bbses, but I don't understand one thing: Why time AM> limits still exists? I mean, I understand why it was back then, but AM> today even raspberry pi can hold a lot of connections for a long time AM> Take me to the underground. Ol> i wonder why the BBSes with their inflexible 80x24 screen, Ol> ridiculous login and registration procedures an terrible user Ol> interfaces still exist. Because callers (and sysops) still like them. Duh. Ol> TUI doesn't mean it has to suck. Correct. Go troll somewhere else. This is a BBS echo, after all. ... Ignorance can be cured. Stupid is forever. === MultiMail/Linux v0.52 --- SBBSecho 3.11-Linux * Origin: Palantir * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL * (1:123/115) SEEN-BY: 1/120 123 14/6 18/0 90/1 103/705 116/116 120/340 601 123/0 SEEN-BY: 123/25 50 115 120 150 170 755 129/215 135/300 153/7715 154/10 SEEN-BY: 154/30 40 50 700 203/0 221/0 6 226/30 227/114 201 400 702 SEEN-BY: 229/101 275 310 426 452 616 664 981 1014 240/5138 5832 5853 SEEN-BY: 240/6309 249/206 317 400 261/38 280/464 5003 288/100 292/854 SEEN-BY: 292/8125 310/31 317/3 320/219 322/757 342/200 396/45 423/120 SEEN-BY: 633/280 712/848 770/1 2432/390 2452/250 2454/119 3634/0 12 SEEN-BY: 3634/15 27 50 119 PATH: 123/115 3634/12 154/10 280/464 240/5832 229/426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]