home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

<< oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]

 Message 618 
 Dan Clough to Oli 
 Re: Time limits 
 07 May 20 11:06:00 
 
TZUTC: -0500
MSGID: 141.fido_linuxbbs@1:123/115 23196ba5
REPLY: 2:280/464.47@fidonet 5eb3f7bf
PID: Synchronet 3.18a-Linux  May  1 2020 GCC 5.5.0
TID: SBBSecho 3.11-Linux r3.171 May  1 2020 GCC 5.5.0
CHRS: ASCII 1
-=> Oli wrote to Ali Mans <=-

 AM> Hi, I'm quite new in bbses, but I don't understand one thing: Why time
 AM> limits still exists? I mean, I understand why it was back then, but
 AM> today even raspberry pi can hold a lot of connections for a long time
 AM> Take me to the underground.

 Ol> i wonder why the BBSes with their inflexible 80x24 screen,
 Ol> ridiculous login and registration procedures an terrible user
 Ol> interfaces still exist.

Because callers (and sysops) still like them.  Duh.

 Ol> TUI doesn't mean it has to suck.

Correct.

Go troll somewhere else.  This is a BBS echo, after all.


... Ignorance can be cured.  Stupid is forever.
=== MultiMail/Linux v0.52
--- SBBSecho 3.11-Linux
 * Origin: Palantir * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL * (1:123/115)
SEEN-BY: 1/120 123 14/6 18/0 90/1 103/705 116/116 120/340 601 123/0
SEEN-BY: 123/25 50 115 120 150 170 755 129/215 135/300 153/7715 154/10
SEEN-BY: 154/30 40 50 700 203/0 221/0 6 226/30 227/114 201 400 702
SEEN-BY: 229/101 275 310 426 452 616 664 981 1014 240/5138 5832 5853
SEEN-BY: 240/6309 249/206 317 400 261/38 280/464 5003 288/100 292/854
SEEN-BY: 292/8125 310/31 317/3 320/219 322/757 342/200 396/45 423/120
SEEN-BY: 633/280 712/848 770/1 2432/390 2452/250 2454/119 3634/0 12
SEEN-BY: 3634/15 27 50 119
PATH: 123/115 3634/12 154/10 280/464 240/5832 229/426


<< oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]

(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca