TZUTC: -0700
MSGID: 102.fidonet_linuxbbs@1:104/116 2476c703
REPLY: 2:230/0 5fb174b7
PID: Synchronet 3.18c-Linux master/93d6a215a Jan 26 2021 GCC 7.3.1
TID: SBBSecho 3.12-Linux master/93d6a215a Jan 26 2021 GCC 7.3.1
COLS: 80
BBSID: CIAD
CHRS: ASCII 1
NOTE: FSEditor.js v1.104
  Re: Re: Run a BBS on a Linux Server
  By: Benny Pedersen to Phillip Taylor on Sun Nov 15 2020 06:32 pm

 > is there any better telnet port that is more safe to use ?
 >
 > retoric all internet service is based on telnet, so only ssl is a secuity
 > layer on top of it, all the remaining ports is basicly still telnet

If you keep an eye on your inbound traffic and immediately create a rule to
"can" the IP or IP-range, you protect yourself a little better.

I'm a firm believer in keeping everything on their correct ports... 22 for
SSH, 23 for Telnet, etc., etc.

Brian Klauss <-> Dream Master
Caught in a Dream | caughtinadream.com a Synchronet BBS
--- SBBSecho 3.12-Linux
 * Origin: Caught in a Dream - caughtinadream.com (1:104/116)
SEEN-BY: 1/123 10/0 1 15/0 2 16/101 19/36 20/4609 90/1 102/401 103/705
SEEN-BY: 104/115 116 105/81 106/201 114/224 702 706 709 116/18 120/331
SEEN-BY: 120/340 123/131 140 124/5016 128/2 73 187 253 129/305 153/757
SEEN-BY: 153/7715 154/10 203/0 214/22 218/0 1 401 410 601 700 720
SEEN-BY: 218/802 810 840 850 221/0 222/2 226/30 227/114 702 229/101
SEEN-BY: 229/424 426 452 550 616 664 981 1016 1017 230/150 152 240/1120
SEEN-BY: 240/5138 5411 5824 5832 5853 6309 249/206 307 317 400 250/1
SEEN-BY: 261/38 100 266/512 267/155 275/100 280/464 5003 282/1031
SEEN-BY: 282/1056 288/100 291/100 111 292/854 8125 305/1 3 310/2 31
SEEN-BY: 312/2 317/3 320/119 219 322/757 340/400 341/66 342/200 396/45
SEEN-BY: 423/120 633/280 640/1321 712/848 770/1 801/161 189 2320/105
SEEN-BY: 2432/390 2452/250 2454/119 3005/1 3634/12 5020/715 1042
PATH: 104/116 15/0 261/38 218/700 103/705 280/464 240/5832 229/426