Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 694  |
|  buanzo to Brian Klauss  |
|  Re: Run a BBS on a Linux Server  |
|  06 Apr 21 11:07:02  |
 TID: Mystic BBS 1.12 A46 MSGID: 4:900/107 dfe2cb40 REPLY: 102.fidonet_linuxbbs@1:104/116 2476c703 TZUTC: -0300 On 27 Jan 2021, Brian Klauss said the following... BK> Re: Re: Run a BBS on a Linux Server BK> By: Benny Pedersen to Phillip Taylor on Sun Nov 15 2020 06:32 pm BK> BK> > is there any better telnet port that is more safe to use ? BK> > BK> > retoric all internet service is based on telnet, so only ssl is a secui BK> > layer on top of it, all the remaining ports is basicly still telnet BK> BK> If you keep an eye on your inbound traffic and immediately create a rule BK> to "can" the IP or IP-range, you protect yourself a little better. If it helps, I created a rule for fail2ban that supports the Mystic BBS log, so it can block attacks, probes, etc. I could adapt it to other softwares, if I am provided with appropriate log files. Cheers. PS: This is what I refer to: http://darkgame.buanzo.org/mystic/ --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Linux/64) * Origin: DaRK Game BBS (4:900/107) SEEN-BY: 1/123 4/0 80/1 88/0 90/0 1 105/81 120/340 123/131 129/305 SEEN-BY: 135/367 226/30 227/114 702 229/101 424 426 452 550 616 664 SEEN-BY: 229/700 981 1016 1017 240/5832 249/206 317 400 282/1038 292/854 SEEN-BY: 317/3 322/757 342/200 633/280 900/0 100 102 105 106 107 108 SEEN-BY: 902/0 6 10 19 26 27 100 PATH: 900/107 902/27 90/1 229/426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]