home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

<< oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]

 Message 2219 
 mark lewis to all 
 ARLB022 FCC's OET Clarifies Emissions Co 
 01 Jul 16 11:07:42 
 
SB QST @ ARL $ARLB022
ARLB022 FCC's OET Clarifies Emissions Compliance Testing for RF LED Lighting
Devices

ZCZC AG22
QST de W1AW
ARRL Bulletin 22  ARLB022
> From ARRL Headquarters
Newington CT  June 30, 2016
To all radio amateurs

SB QST ARL ARLB022
ARLB022 FCC's OET Clarifies Emissions Compliance Testing for RF LED Lighting
Devices

The FCC's Office of Engineering and Technology (OET) has clarified that all RF
LED lighting devices falling under Part 15 rules as "unintentional radiators"
must meet conducted and radiated emissions limits set forth in those rules.

"Operation of Part 15 unintentional radiators is subject to the condition that
no harmful interference is caused," the OET reminded, in a knowledge database
paper released on June 17. "Manufacturers and users should therefore note that
lighting devices are required to cease operation, if harmful interference
occurs."

The OET said radiated emissions measurements must be performed at least from
30 MHz to 1000 MHz to adequately demonstrate compliance with Part 15 (15.109).
Its guidance, the OET continued, applies to RF LED lighting devices that, in
the past, have been considered to operate on frequencies below 1.705 MHz.
Previously, devices operating between 9 kHz and 1705 kHz had to be tested only
for radiated emissions up to 30 MHz, where no specified radiated emissions
limits exist, and were exempt from testing from 30 MHz to 1000 MHz. The OET
said it recognizes that routine radiated emissions measurements are needed
under Part 15, based on the highest frequency generated or used in the device.

"[W]e have found that emissions from RF LED lighting devices are non-periodic,
broadband in nature, and are produced as a byproduct of the internal driver
circuitry within the RF LED lighting device," the OET "knowledge database"
paper said. "These types of emissions have adequate energy and potential to
generate radiated emissions well above 30 MHz."

The ARRL Lab's Electromagnetic Compatibility Engineer Mike Gruber, W1MG, said
he was pleased to see the FCC's OET clarify the test measurement requirements.
He said ARRL is generally hearing more RFI complaints stemming from RF LED
bulbs.

"Not only are the emissions limits higher for Part 15 LED bulbs - as opposed
to Part 18 fluorescent and CFL bulbs, they seem to be winning out in terms of
consumer popularity," Gruber said. "Higher limits and more bulbs probably make
for more complaints." Gruber said the Lab has seen LED lighting devices
causing problems in the 2 meter band. "Since conducted emissions limits do not
apply above 30 MHz, radiated emissions limits can be the first line of defense
against RFI at these higher frequencies."

Gruber pointed out that noise generated by street and traffic lighting can be
widespread. In such instances, he suggested that Part 15b limits for
residential areas should apply. "These limits are lower than Part 15a limits,
which are intended only for commercial and industrial environments," he
explained. "This is especially critical in cases where a pole transformer
connected to the lighting device also feeds a home or residence. The 240 V
split-phase secondary system can conduct RF into a residence through the
service entrance panel." He suggested that the lower limits may benefit mobile
users.

The OET noted that the ANSI Accredited Standards Committee C63-EMC is drafting
measurement procedures for lighting devices. "When complete, we expect it will
address in greater detail the measurement procedures and configurations to be
used in determining compliance," the OET said.

NNNN
/EX

)\/(ark

Always Mount a Scratch Monkey

... You WHAT?! You told my wife I said I was in total control.
---
 * Origin:  (1:3634/12.73)

<< oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]

(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca