Hello Kees,

On Thursday November 03 2016 22:30, you wrote to Andrew Leary:

 KE>>>  I have had a "look" at 3.4.6, not tested it jet. What I
 KE>>> gathered from the docomentation and the source code, is that a
 KE>>> BOM from submitted fts5 lines will be removed, but the
 KE>>> copyright, prolog and epilog are untouched. Shouldn't the BOM be
 KE>>> removed from these files as well?

 AL>> Good point.  I'll have to add scanning for BOMs in those files as
 AL>> well.

Indeed, good point, never thought of testing the prolog/epilog..

 KE>  There were no problems there. The REMoveBOM flag was enabled, but
 KE> ofcourse there were no BOM's in the input files. I will leave the
 KE> creation of files with BOM markers to Michiel.

See boms.zip in your inbound.

 KE> He uses a MS-editor, that adds such usefull information.

Not really. The editor I normally use does not add boms. I had to revert to
some trickery to add boms for testing.


Cheers, Michiel

--- GoldED+/W32-MSVC 1.1.5-b20130111
 * Origin: http://www.vlist.eu (2:280/5555)