Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 23984  |
|  august abolins to George Pope  |
|  newfound religion  |
|  11 Nov 22 03:36:20  |
 REPLY: 1:153/757.0 b99e7a2e MSGID: 2:221/1.59 636e0984 TZUTC: -0500 CHRS: CP437 GP> Then you get some guy who took a job that was to include scheduling on any GP> days, per the boss' needs. & he later converted to some obscure religion GP> that had certain days off, & sued, as the boss, when asked for those days GP> to be blocked off, essentially said, "I hired you to fill any shifts GP> without blocked off times," sadly, the courts ruled against the employer, GP> & he had to pay back pay plus interest for those days worked against his GP> newfound religion. Where and when did that happen? I would think that there would be equal "laws" and tests in law that define WHEN someone's idea of religion is actually a valid religion. --- AfterShock/Android 1.6.11 * Origin: Mobile Pix (2:221/1.59) SEEN-BY: 1/19 123 15/0 16/0 19/10 37 90/1 105/81 106/201 120/340 123/130 SEEN-BY: 123/131 129/305 142/104 153/7715 203/0 218/700 221/1 6 360 SEEN-BY: 226/30 227/114 229/110 111 112 113 114 206 317 400 424 426 SEEN-BY: 229/428 452 470 664 700 240/5832 266/512 280/464 5003 282/1038 SEEN-BY: 292/854 301/1 317/3 320/119 219 319 2119 322/0 757 326/101 SEEN-BY: 342/200 396/45 423/81 460/58 633/280 712/848 PATH: 221/1 320/219 229/426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]