Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 1061  |
|  August Abolins to Jimmy Anderson  |
|  movies as $ failures, but  |
|  10 Feb 21 18:03:32  |
 MSGID: 2:460/256 00000069 REPLY: 1:116/18 e7c53145 PID: tg_BBS_v0.6.3 CHRS: CP866 2 TGUID: 1223717052 REPLYTO 2:460/256 1223717052 RealName: August Abolins 2:221/1.58 JA> -=> August Abolins wrote to All <=- JA> JA> AA> Has anyone here enjoyed a film that was deemed a financial failure at JA> AA> the box-office? JA> JA> Yep! And I don't care what the critics say either - that does NOT tell me JA> whether *I* will enjoy it or not. :-) JA> JA> JA> JA> JA> JA> ... To get back on your feet, just miss two car payments. For me, although there is a fine element of surprise to be enjoyed with a film that hasn't bared any scrutiny since it might be a new release, most of the time those occassions are few. Meanwhile, I've come to appreciate the commentaries of respected critics who communicate enough details so that I can decide whether a certain film is a waste of time and money or not. Over time, I have found that Leonard Maltin does a very good job describing the pluses and minuses of a film. From that, I can decide if it I want to try it.His "ratings" have been quite consistent with my opinions too. --- tg BBS v0.6.3 * Origin: Fido by Telegram BBS by Stas Mishchenkov (2:460/256) SEEN-BY: 1/123 90/1 105/81 120/340 123/131 124/5016 129/305 154/10 SEEN-BY: 203/0 221/0 226/30 227/114 702 229/101 424 426 428 550 664 SEEN-BY: 229/1016 1017 240/2100 5138 5411 5832 5853 249/206 317 400 SEEN-BY: 280/464 5003 288/100 292/8125 310/31 317/3 320/219 322/757 SEEN-BY: 342/200 396/45 423/120 460/58 256 777 1124 5858 633/280 770/1 SEEN-BY: 2452/250 2454/119 5054/30 PATH: 460/256 58 280/464 240/5832 229/426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]