home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

<< oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]

 Message 1061 
 August Abolins to Jimmy Anderson 
 movies as $ failures, but 
 10 Feb 21 18:03:32 
 
MSGID: 2:460/256 00000069
REPLY: 1:116/18 e7c53145
PID: tg_BBS_v0.6.3
CHRS: CP866 2
TGUID: 1223717052
REPLYTO 2:460/256 1223717052
RealName: August Abolins 2:221/1.58
 JA> -=> August Abolins wrote to All <=-
 JA> 
 JA> AA> Has anyone here enjoyed a film that was deemed a financial failure at
 JA> AA> the box-office?  
 JA> 
 JA> Yep! And I don't care what the critics say either - that does NOT tell me
 JA> whether *I* will enjoy it or not. :-)
 JA> 
 JA> 
 JA> 
 JA> 
 JA> 
 JA> ... To get back on your feet, just miss two car payments.

For me, although there is a fine element of surprise to be enjoyed with a film
that hasn't bared any scrutiny since it might be a new release, most of the
time those occassions are few.  Meanwhile, I've come to appreciate the
commentaries of respected critics who communicate enough details so that I can
decide whether a certain film is a waste of time and money or not.

Over time, I have found that Leonard Maltin does a very good job describing
the pluses and minuses of a film. From that, I can decide if it I want to try
it.His "ratings" have been quite consistent with my opinions too.


--- tg BBS v0.6.3
 * Origin: Fido by Telegram BBS by Stas Mishchenkov (2:460/256)
SEEN-BY: 1/123 90/1 105/81 120/340 123/131 124/5016 129/305 154/10
SEEN-BY: 203/0 221/0 226/30 227/114 702 229/101 424 426 428 550 664
SEEN-BY: 229/1016 1017 240/2100 5138 5411 5832 5853 249/206 317 400
SEEN-BY: 280/464 5003 288/100 292/8125 310/31 317/3 320/219 322/757
SEEN-BY: 342/200 396/45 423/120 460/58 256 777 1124 5858 633/280 770/1
SEEN-BY: 2452/250 2454/119 5054/30
PATH: 460/256 58 280/464 240/5832 229/426


<< oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]

(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca