Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 1190  |
|  August Abolins to Kurt Weiske  |
|  Johnny Depp Vs. Amber Heard  |
|  01 Jun 22 23:12:00  |
 MSGID: 2:221/1.58@fidonet fd01abc3 REPLY: 1063.movies@1:218/700 26fd38d7 PID: OpenXP/5.0.51 (Win32) CHRS: ASCII 1 TZUTC: -0400 Hello Kurt! ** On Wednesday 01.06.22 - 17:05, you wrote: AA>> I guess the trick is when someonr sues YOU, you then AA>> counter-sue for the chance to be awarded "compensatory AA>> damages". KW> I suppose Johnny Depp can go back and sue his attorney, KW> since his attorney's statements were the ones that were KW> called out in Amber Heard's judgement. Maybe.. but for a $2M diff, it's probably not worth it. I doubt that his ex-wife won the $2M based on some statements made by the opposing lawyers in the courtroom. My understanding is that a counter-claim has to be filed BEFORE trial. So.. if the woman won a judgement, it was likely something that was expressed by Johnny's counsel in the series of affidavits going on back and forth before trial. KW> It's a never ending cycle of lawyers. I'm sure the KW> lawyer's lawyer will counter-sue. We shall see. But a judge can just arbitrarily cut that short and deny it. -- ../|ug --- OpenXP 5.0.51 * Origin: Join MOVIES = https://tinyurl.com/ydjv9chf (2:221/1.58) SEEN-BY: 1/123 15/0 90/1 105/81 106/201 120/340 123/131 124/5016 129/305 SEEN-BY: 129/330 331 153/757 7715 154/10 203/0 218/700 221/1 6 360 SEEN-BY: 226/30 227/114 229/110 111 112 113 206 317 400 424 426 428 SEEN-BY: 229/470 550 664 700 240/5832 266/512 280/464 5003 282/1038 SEEN-BY: 292/8125 301/1 310/31 317/3 320/219 322/757 341/234 342/200 SEEN-BY: 396/45 423/81 120 460/58 633/267 280 281 412 416 712/848 SEEN-BY: 770/1 2452/250 PATH: 221/1 280/464 633/280 229/426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]