Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    mtl.general    |    Ahh Montreal, home of good strip joints    |    39,416 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 37,454 of 39,416    |
|    =?UTF-8?B?Q29uyYBSQ29uyYA=?= to All    |
|    MM&A declares bankruptcy, still wants ac    |
|    16 Aug 13 14:10:15    |
      XPost: can.politics, ont.politics       From: ConsRCons@govt.cda              MM&A was responsible for leveling a town centre and killing half a       hundred people. They declared bankruptcy to protect their asses (aka       assets). They were found to have been carrying less insurance in Canada       than in the U.S. They were ordered to shut down all operations in Quebec.              And this bloody company has the gall to CHALLENGE the shut-down order?       My prediction is that if they try to fight the shut-down order, we're       going to see protesters shutting down those tracks for MM&A.       _____________________________________________              By: Allan Woods Quebec Bureau, Published on Fri Aug 16 2013                     Lac Megantic: MM&A Railway will likely challenge order to cease operations                     There is a “strong possibility” that Montreal, Maine & Atlantic Railway       will challenge a federal order to shut down its Canadian operations by       next week, said the railway’s court-appointed overseer.                     Montreal, Maine & Atlantic Railway has until Tuesday to cease operations       after a probe by the Canadian Transportation Agency determined its       insurance coverage and finances were insufficient to cover it in the       event of an additional accident.                     MONTREAL—There is a “strong possibility” the rail company implicated in       last month’s deadly Lac-Mégantic explosion will challenge a federal       order to shut down its Canadian operations by next week, said Montreal,       Maine & Atlantic’s court-appointed overseer.              The consideration is being made amid a panic scenario that has the rail       carrier looking for firms to lease its tracks or buy the ailing business       outright.              “Everything is on the table” as the company tries to keep its head above       water while the financial claims against it continue to mount.              “If the company was to find an operator until a purchaser is found then       the company would entertain that possibility,” said Gilles Robillard,       who was named last week by a Quebec judge to handle the firm’s       bankruptcy proceedings.       More Video              Talks toward an eventual sale of the short-line railway that operates in       the northeastern United States and in Quebec are also proceeding, but       nothing will be finalized in the coming days, he said.              The company behind the train disaster that killed 47 people and wiped       out a large swath of the city’s downtown core has until Tuesday to cease       operations after a probe by the Canadian Transportation Agency       determined its insurance coverage and finances were insufficient to       cover it in the event of an additional accident.              The ruling handed down earlier this week is a potentially fatal blow to       MM&A’s bankruptcy plan to pay back its creditors and maintain the value       of its $18 million in assets until it such time as they could be sold to       another rail company.              Reports Friday said the company’s attempt to have the CTA reconsider the       decision was turned down Thursday. But the fight may not have gone out       of MM&A just yet, said Robillard.              “It’s possible to go to court and ask the judge to suspend the (Canadian       Transportation Agency’s) ruling — to stay it — at least to give the       company some time to find an alternative to either find an operator that       has more insurance that satisfies (the agency), or to obtain the       additional tranche of insurance that’s being requested by (the agency).”              Robillard said there is a “strong possibility” that MM&A will follow       this route in the coming days.              A spokesperson for the agency that revoked MM&A’s certificate of fitness       earlier this week said the company can appeal the decision or ask for a       re-evaluation when it obtains sufficient insurance. But in this       particular case, the company needs a speedy resolution to a situation       that could have grave implications for many.              That includes the many businesses that rely on rail service to receive       raw materials and ship products to market, as well as parties like the       town of Lac-Mégantic and the Quebec government that have had to pay the       company’s bills for the cleanup of soil and water that was exposed to       the millions of litres of light crude oil.              The Quebec government this week ordered Canadian Pacific Rail, who       signed a contract with MM&A to transport the petroleum, to help pick up       the cleanup tab, which it is so far refusing to do.              Putting the rail company out of business could make it more difficult       for families of the dead and those who have lost homes and businesses to       obtain financial compensation through a class-action lawsuit, said       Robillard.              “It depends on the ability of the company to be in operations,” he said.       “From the assets of Montreal, Maine & Atlantic they won’t be (satisfied)       because between the insurance and everything, the numbers that have been       put forward with respect to the contamination costs, we’re talking big       money.”              MM&A’s application for bankruptcy protection pegged the cleanup costs at       over $200 million. There have been figures attached to the compensation       lawsuits filed by business owners and victims’ families but they are       sure to be worth many millions of dollars.              Robillard also cautioned against the rush-to-judgment against MM&A and       said that the various investigations underway — by the provincial       police, by the federal Transportation Safety Board — could result in       shared blame for the deadliest Canadian train disaster in recent history.              “MM&A may be responsible, but they may not be the only ones,” he said.       “They may not be the only ones who are called upon to assume part of the       costs.”              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca