XPost: can.politics   
   From: ConsRCons@govt.cda   
      
   On 9/13/2013 9:19 PM, spratton@hotmail.com wrote:   
   > On Friday, 13 September 2013 19:01:03 UTC-7, Liberals are VERMIN  wrote:   
   >> On Friday, September 13, 2013 9:18:08 PM UTC-4, holy man wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> I guess priests and nuns engaged on provincial gov't projects will have to   
   dig out those jeans and t-shirts.  Quebec's premier has led her gov't into a   
   foolish muddle, and they will regret it.   
   >>> I imagine they will now have to specify what size of emblem, and what   
   position on the body, and what colours or brilliance denote a "conspicuous"   
   religious symbol.  The language police will have a twin organization equipped   
   with micrometers and tape    
   measures.   
   >>> Oh, and will I be reprimanded, working for the provincial gov't, if I am   
   heard muttering forbidden phrases such as "Lord knows", or crossing myself?   
   >>> The ancient Buddhist backward-swastika tattoos that many people have on   
   their hands will lose you your job, as will Christian cross tattoos?  But what   
   if it's a cross-of-Lorraine?   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> Sharia laws to be introduced in short order, huh?   
   > No; shariah would make a religious symbol compulsory. Maurois wants no   
   religions at all.   
      
      
   She doesn't want them in institutions that are not religious   
   institutions - but are public-serving institutions.   
   I don't disagree with that concept.   
      
   It should be no difficulty for any Catholic, Jew or muslim woman to   
   comply with such legislation.  The only ones who might feel very   
   challenged are the muslim men who hide some very long hair beneath those   
   turbans.  Where does that long hair go?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)