Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    mtl.general    |    Ahh Montreal, home of good strip joints    |    39,416 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 37,583 of 39,416    |
|    =?UTF-8?B?Q29uyYBSQ29uyYA=?= to All    |
|    Disasters will be the =?UTF-8?B?4oCYbmV3    |
|    19 Oct 13 20:24:10    |
      XPost: can.politics, ab.politics, bc.politics       XPost: man.politics, ont.politics, sk.politics       From: ConsRCons@govt.cda              The Canadian Press - Saturday, Oct. 19 2013               Ottawa must improve rail safety or disasters will be the ‘new normal,’       Greenpeace says                            TORONTO — Train disasters such as Saturday’s derailment in Alberta will       become the “new normal” unless Ottawa tightens safety rules for shipping       dangerous goods by rail, Greenpeace Canada warned.              A CN train carrying crude oil and gas went off the tracks overnight in a       hamlet west of Edmonton, sparking a massive fire that reportedly       triggered two explosions.              It’s the third major derailment in the province in recent months, at a       time when rail safety is increasingly under scrutiny.              Greenpeace said given the industry’s outdated safety standards, it’s       only a matter of time until disaster strikes again.              Keith Stewart, the organization’s climate and energy campaign       co-ordinator, said the federal government has taken some steps since       July’s devastating derailment in Lac-Mégantic, Que., but not enough to       mitigate the risks.              He wants Ottawa to launch a comprehensive review of the safety       regulations for transporting oil, whether by train or other means.              “Unless they’re actually willing to bring in serious new safety measures       for oil by rail, this will become the new normal,” he said Saturday in a       phone interview from Vancouver.              “Three years ago, there was almost no oil being moved by rail. It’s been       growing incredibly rapidly and it’s projected to keep growing that way       and the safety standards in Canada simply have not kept up to the new       ways to move new kinds of oil,” he said.              “I think what’s happened is we’re putting more and more oil on an       infrastructure that is aging and wasn’t really designed for it in the       first place and that’s increasing risks.”              There were no reports of injuries in Saturday’s derailment, but the tiny       community of Gainford was evacuated due to the fire.              Ben West, a campaigner with environmental group Forest Ethics, said the       latest derailment raises questions about the continued use of older oil       train cars he called more vulnerable to spilling upon derailment.              “In the short term, with the existing traffic, we really should be       looking at what kind of train cars are being used. Some of these old       cars seem really problematic.”              “It is possible with newer cars to at least try to make sure the fuel       inside of the cars isn’t making its way into the local environment” when       a derailment occurs, he said.              West said the federal government is allowing the expansion of       oil-by-rail as a substitute method to move more fuel at a time when       major pipeline projects face major hurdles, such as complex approval       processes and fierce opposition.              “To try to get around the pipeline process by pushing more rail through,       especially with the implications of it, seems highly irresponsible to me       and fundamentally undemocratic without the kind of oversight and public       process we’ve had around the pipelines.”              Rail safety has been a hot button issue since tank cars filled with oil       exploded after rolling into Lac-Mégantic – a catastrophe that ravaged       the town’s historic core and claimed an estimated 47 lives.              Transport Canada issued several emergency orders in response to the       tragedy, requiring that at least two crew members must work trains that       carry dangerous goods.              In addition, no locomotive attached to one or more loaded tank cars       transporting dangerous materials can be left unattended on a main track.              The Federation of Canadian Municipalities also formed a rail-safety       working group shortly after the Lac-Mégantic derailment and asked       Transport Canada for more information about the transportation of       hazardous goods.              But federal officials have cautioned that such information could pose a       safety risk if it fell into the wrong hands.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca