home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   mtl.general      Ahh Montreal, home of good strip joints      39,416 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 37,672 of 39,416   
   Carter to All   
   Re: And still another loss for Harper &    
   26 Nov 13 19:29:47   
   
   XPost: can.politics, nf.general, ns.general   
   XPost: ont.politics, bc.politics   
   From: rotf@lmao.nf   
      
   On 25/11/2013 8:21 PM, ConÉ€RConÉ€ wrote:   
   > On 11/25/2013 3:11 PM, Carter wrote:   
   >> Why are you trying to politicize something that is not a   
   >> political   
   >> issue? Any Canadian government, regardless of it's political   
   >> stripe,   
   >> would appeal this nonsensical ruling.   
   >   
   >   
   > If it's "not a political issue", why is the government of   
   > Canada involved?   
      
   Sorry I left out a word, although I would have thought you would   
   have understood my message by simply reading the last sentence.   
      
   Let me rephrase the question; Why are you trying to make a   
   partisan political issue out of something which isn't? This is   
   not a political issue, partisan or otherwise, it is an issue of   
   international trade.   
      
   To answer your question; Governments are involved in many things   
   which have nothing to do with politics. An example of that it the   
   humanitarian operation, involving the military DART team, which   
   our federal government is presently running in The Philippines.   
      
   My question, as rephrased, still stands. I'm curious.   
      
   Carter   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca