Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    mtl.general    |    Ahh Montreal, home of good strip joints    |    39,416 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 37,726 of 39,416    |
|    =?UTF-8?B?Q29uyYDGpkNvbsmA?= to All    |
|    'Senategate' - far from over . . . . (1/    |
|    02 Jan 14 18:09:15    |
      XPost: can.politics, bc.politics, ab.politics       XPost: ont.politics       From: ConsRCons@govt.cda               Happy New Year to all of Harper's appointees in the senate . . . .       ______________________________________              Postmedia News January 2, 2014              Senators might be interviewed under oath, visited at home in audit of       Senate spending                     OTTAWA â CanadaâÂÂs auditor general has notified senators       that a       sweeping probe of their spending may include visits to their homes, and       that they could be interviewed under oath in âÂÂexceptional       circumstances.â              The details are laid out in documents auditor general Michael       FergusonâÂÂs office provided to senators in November about the       comprehensive audit of Senate expenses. Copies of the documents,       including a three-page letter Ferguson wrote to senators, were obtained       by Postmedia News.              The documents note the Senate spending audit may include auditors       visiting the places senators have declared as their primary residence in       order to qualify for a $22,000-a-year housing allowance, and looking at       spending outside the current period under review â April 2011 to       March 2013 âÂÂif auditors have concerns about any senator.              Senatorsâ staff may be interviewed together or separately from       their bosses, and possibly under oath.              Ã¢ÂÂThe objective of the audit of the Senate of Canada is to determine       whether senatorsâ expenses and other senatorsâ       transactions       have been properly controlled and incurred for parliamentary business       with due regard for the use of public funds,â reads part of the       summary of the audit plan given to senators.              The documents include a draft summary of the audit plan and copies of       slides used in a presentation Ferguson and his office made to senators       in late October. That closed-door meeting took place on Parliament Hill       as the Senate debated suspending senators Mike Duffy, Patrick Brazeau       and Pamela Wallin without pay over charges of âÂÂgross       negligenceâ with their expenses.              The documents suggest FergusonâÂÂs team will probe deeper into the       spending habits of senators â including scrutinizing the spot       senators tell the Senate they call home â than outside auditors       from Deloitte did in 2013.              The Deloitte auditors didnâÂÂt note in their final reports that they       visited house visits as part of audits of housing claims from Duffy and       Brazeau, and former Liberal senator Mac Harb.              RCMP investigators looking into the questionable spending visited       HarbâÂÂs and BrazeauâÂÂs declared primary residences. In       court       documents, the Mounties have alleged HarbâÂÂs primary       residence was âÂÂuninhabitable,â and that Brazeau claimed       his fatherâÂÂs house as his primary residence.              It was in August that the Senate invited FergusonâÂÂs office to       conduct a comprehensive audit. Ferguson has been given greater access       than his predecessor, Sheila Fraser, who was allowed a limited review of       a small sample of expense claims.              This time, Ferguson is reviewing the claims of all senators who have       been in the upper chamber over the last two years. However, that time       line is flexible: âÂÂOn an exception basis, we will expand this time       period as needed to verify other matters that come to our       attention,â the audit summary reads.              The planning phase for the audit is over and teams of auditors have been       going into senatorsâ office poring through spending-related       documents. Senators are expected to provide auditors with expense       documents within five days of them being requested, and alert       FergusonâÂÂs teams if any of the documents have been altered.              Senators were told late last year that auditors would ask for any       documents or records they felt they needed to see, including documents       subject to solicitor-client privilege. Senators have balked at requests       for those documents, and have also questioned auditorsâ request for       personal banking and credit card information.              Ã¢ÂÂWe will request information that we determine is relevant and       necessary to enable us to carry out the audit,â Ferguson wrote in a       November letter to senators. âÂÂWe may also access information held       by third parties, and auditors may visit the location of senatorsâ       primary residence.              Ã¢ÂÂIn addition, we will be conducting interviews with you and your       staff (either together or separately). Under certain circumstances,       interviews may be conducted under oath, as authorized by the Auditor       General Act.â              FergusonâÂÂs final report is expected to publicly list findings for       each senator. According to the documents, the final report will be       finished by December 2014.              None of the senators under investigation by the RCMP â Duffy,       Wallin, Brazeau and Harb â will be included in the audit. Nor will       the audit teams scrutinize the expenses of deceased senators, such as       Doug Finley, or Joyce Fairbairn, who retired early due to health reasons.              Aside from housing expenses, the spending audit includes the following       expense areas:              Ã¢Â¢ Travel â both personal and while on Senate or       inter-parliamentary committee business â and hospitality expenses;              Ã¢Â¢ Staffing policies, such as hiring and firing of employees, which       internal audits have flagged in the past as being problematic;              Ã¢Â¢ Office spending, such as purchases of goods and services,       including contractors for research. Office budgets in the last fiscal       year were $161,200.              Wallin landed in hot water for her travel spending, and repaid about       $150,000 in questionable claims. Harb and Brazeau were ordered to repay       their questionable claims, despite Deloitte auditors saying they       couldnâÂÂt determine if any rules were broken.              Harb repaid about $231,000 in housing claims going back several years.       Brazeau has steadfastly denied wrongdoing, and the Senate has decided to       clawback his salary to recoup the $49,000 he owes â an action put       on hold while he is suspended without pay.              DuffyâÂÂs housing claims have come under RCMP scrutiny, as well as a       $90,000 payment from Prime Minister Stephen HarperâÂÂs former chief       of staff, Nigel Wright. The RCMP have also probed his office spending,       including allegations in court documents that Duffy gave $65,000 worth       of contracts to an old friend that resulted in little or no work.                     [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca