Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    mtl.general    |    Ahh Montreal, home of good strip joints    |    39,416 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 37,810 of 39,416    |
|    =?UTF-8?B?Q29uyYDGpkNvbsmA?= to Kim Dobranski posting as M.I.Wakefi    |
|    Re: Canada loses nearly 46,000 jobs in D    |
|    11 Jan 14 17:45:54    |
      XPost: can.politics, bc.politics, ont.politics       XPost: ab.politics, man.politics       From: ConsRCons@govt.cda              >> How come you forgot to mention China, Dobranski?              Kim Dobranski posting as M.I.Wakefield wrote:       > Because Canada hasn't signed or agreed to a Free Trade Agreement with       > China.       >       > Read. Learn. Get back to us.              No, you do that. The deal has been signed. In September of 2012       _________________________________              The federal government has come under heavy scrutiny from opposition       parties and critics alike after Prime Minister Stephen Harper signed an       investment treaty with China, formally known as a Foreign Investment       Promotion and Protection Agreement (FIPA), while at the APEC Summit in       Vladivostok, Russia, on Sept.9, 2012.       ________________________________              And as to whether Harper has already RATIFIED it as well, we don't know.        Why? Because we have a Harper government and it does a whole lot of       its dirty work in secret.       __________________              The government had signalled last fall its intention to ratify the       investment treaty it signed with China and tabled in Parliament in       September, but six months have passed and the Conservatives have yet to       adopt the deal.              "The Canada-China investment treaty has not been unanimously accepted —       even among Conservatives," NDP international trade critic Don Davies       told CBC News in a telephone interview on Sunday.              The Canadian government has been criticized for negotiating this deal       behind closed doors. Opposition critics and experts say it contains       significant gaps and provides few benefits for Canada.       _____________________________              Defiant Conservative backbenchers              Conservatives have pointed out that the FIPA with China didn't have to       be debated in Parliament because treaty making is a royal prerogative       and as such can become law through a cabinet order-in-council after       sitting in Parliament for no less than 21 days after being tabled on       Sept. 26, 2012.              That means the Conservatives could have sent a diplomatic note to China       saying the deal was ratified as early as the end of last October.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca