XPost: can.politics, ab.politics, bc.politics   
   XPost: ont.politics   
   From: ConsRCons@govt.cda   
      
   >> The question isn't about whether to use rail or pipelines. It's about   
   >> how to reduce our need for both.   
      
   Kim Dobranski aka M.I.Wakefield wrote:   
   > You could sell your truck and bike everywhere.  Same with gordo.   
   >   
   > You both live in a climate where that's a reasonable alternative.   
   >   
   > Or doesn't your commitment to the environment run to the point of   
   > personal inconvenience?   
      
      
   We could ALL make our own puny sacrifices and impact very little with   
   regards the environment.   
   However, if the tarsands had their expansion stopped, their current   
   extraction processes heavily monitored and the damage curtailed and   
   remedied immediately, that 'inconvenience' could be limited to the   
   companies at the source of the problem - and not to the users of their   
   protected dirty resources.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)