Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    mtl.general    |    Ahh Montreal, home of good strip joints    |    39,416 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 37,999 of 39,416    |
|    =?UTF-8?B?Q29uyYDGpkNvbsmA?= to All    |
|    U.S. scientists step in for Harper-silen    |
|    26 Jan 14 12:34:58    |
      XPost: can.politics, bc.politics, ab.politics       XPost: ont.politics       From: ConsRCons@govt.cda              U.S. study warns of risks and unknowns in shipment of Alberta oilsands       products                     The Canadian Press - January 26, 2014                     VANCOUVER - U.S. scientists are warning that there are environmental       risks, regulatory holes and serious unknowns regarding the shipment of       Alberta oilsands products by pipeline, rail and tanker.              The findings are in a 153-page report from last September by the       emergency response division of the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric       Administration. The unit has expertise in preparing for, evaluating and       responding to oil and chemical spills in coastal environments.              Enbridge (TSX:ENB), the company behind the proposed Northern Gateway       pipeline to the British Columbia coast, counters that most of the       concerns raised in the report are out-of-date, overstated or being resolved.              The study examined the different ways to transport Alberta's bitumen, a       molasses-like crude oil, over U.S. land and water. Those included rail,       the proposed Kinder-Morgan Trans Mountain pipeline to Vancouver, the       Keystone XL line to Texas from Alberta, and Northern Gateway.              "Most oilsands products are transported to market via existing and       proposed pipelines; however, a sharp increase in the use of rail and       marine transport can be expected while new pipelines are constructed to       match the increased production of oilsands products," the report says.              It was written by six experts at the University of Washington and       supervised by Prof. Robert Pavia of the university's School of Marine       and Environmental Affairs.              "While there are many arguments about the level of risk, no one believes       the risk is zero," Pavia told The Canadian Press, adding that he was       speaking personally. "In my mind it's not a question of whether a spill       will occur, but how well-prepared we are for a spill once it does occur."              In the case of Northern Gateway, not only might there be potential to       harm Washington state shores, there could be hazards from tankers       leaving Kitimat, B.C., to travel through the waters of Alaska, near the       Aleutian Islands to Asia. The proposed 1,177-kilometre-long pipeline       would carry 525,000 barrels of bitumen daily from Alberta to the       northern B.C. port.              Both Canada and the United States need to renew and expand efforts to       reduce any risks, Pavia said.              Last December, a federal joint review panel supported the project β       providing Enbridge meets 209 conditions. The final decision rests with       the federal cabinet.              The U.S. report notes there are information gaps about the transport of       bitumen.              "Little research is currently available regarding the behaviour of       oilsands products spilled into water, and how they weather in the       environment," the report says.              "Most tests have been conducted in the laboratory, so predicting the       actual behaviour of oilsands products for a range of spills is       difficult." The risks associated with carrying oilsands products over       water "are not well-defined."              The study does point out that only a handful of spills have occurred in       the U.S. and Canada.              Enbridge communications manager Ivan Giesbrecht said that's a positive       thing.              "This further supports that these products do not pose increased risk       for transmission pipeline corrosion," he said in an interview.              In 2007, a neighbourhood in Burnaby, B.C., was covered in synthetic       crude when excavation equipment ruptured a pipeline. In 2010, a pipeline       leaked 20,000 barrels of oil into the Kalamazoo River in Michigan.              Last September's report also points out that anyone responding to an       oilsands spill could face both oil that is light and floating or heavier       oil that could sink.              "This could impact fish and birds that move between water and air, such       as those that may inhale toxic fumes, or become coated by oil. Sinking       oil could move into the water column and harm fish larvae.              "Current capabilities to detect and recover oil when it sinks or is       suspended in the water column are poor."       [. . . ]              The U.S. study says research is needed into the public health impacts of       oilspills, weathering effects and biodegradation, and there should be       more testing with a wider variety of oilsands products.              Giesbrecht said Enbridge doesn't agree with the findings of the U.S.       study. He said the company is committed to applying industry best       practices and to developing leak-detection technologies.              The report also noted "regulator shortcomings," including that oilsands       products aren't subject to the U.S. excise tax that provides funds for       spill cleanup, and that there was scant product information provided by       the facilities that transport the oil they're handling.              "There are additional gaps in policies and regulations that warrant       scrutiny as transport of oilsands products and other unconventional oils       increases," the report said.              Federal and state railway regulators have played a minor role in oil       spill planning, but given recent high-profile accidents, like the deadly       crash and explosion in Lac-Megantic, Que., the report suggests more       regulatory oversight over rail transport should be considered.       ____________________________       CBC News Posted: Jan 25, 2014              [TransCanada] Natural gas pipeline explodes near Otterburne, Man.       [that would be the company wanting the Keystone pipeline approved]       Thousands without heat south of Winnipeg as arctic blast moves in              http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/natural-gas-pipeline-expl       des-near-otterburne-man-1.2510873              ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~               βIt is horrifying that we have to fight our own government to save       the environment.β β Ansel Adams              ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca