XPost: can.politics, ont.politics, bc.politics   
   XPost: ab.politics   
   From: weasel@stew.yum   
      
   On 3/30/2014 11:57 AM, {~_~} Раиса wrote:   
   >> On 3/29/2014 6:09 PM, TomP wrote:   
   >>> That was a stupid thing for the snowmobile rider to do. This situation   
   >>> could easily have gone out of control which is a worry to police. The   
   >>> television news report stated that the RCMP were considering if charges   
   >>> should be laid against the farmer.   
   >>>   
   >>> And that's the problem of not knowing where the semi assault rifles that   
   >>> have been banned will show up. This farmer could have easily taken out   
   >>> both these guys in a matter of seconds if he had a semi automatic rifle.   
   >>> All because someone else drove over his cat.   
   >   
   >   
   > Kim Dobranski posting as Chom Noamsky wrote:   
   >> Yes, exactly, somebody else drove over his cat, but it was a class of   
   >> person known as the trespassing snowmobiler.  The pattern of abuse by   
   >> this class of person obviously came to a steaming head.  As one   
   >> commenter put it, call police until you're blue in the face and there is   
   >> not much of anything they will do about it.  So, either suffer the abuse   
   >> or go chase the assholes off your property (and your neighbours'   
   >> property, who likely feel exactly the same way).   
   >   
   > Guns are not allowed in Canada 'for trespassers', ya dumb rabbit.   
   > They're not even allowed - with very few exceptions - 'for personal   
   > protection'.   
   >   
   > You might want to reread the Canadian laws, gun owner.  Because you seem   
   > as screwed in the head as most gun owners who become criminal gun users.   
   >   
   > And you might also want to ask what people in more crowded countries,   
   > where guns are just not allowed at all.  They don't have the 'privilege'   
   > of threatening someone's life over trespass.   
   > Time Canada got smarter.  Certainly it's too late for the Americans.   
      
   Winners never lie and liars never win, that's why you've been holding   
   the shit end of the stick all you life, Kewen.  The laws supports using   
   as much force as is necessary to remove someone from your property,   
   whether that be with a gun or a nerf hammer:   
      
   Section 41: Defence of house or real property   
      
   41. (1) Every one who is in peaceable possession of a dwelling-house or   
   real property, and every one lawfully assisting him or acting under his   
   authority, is justified in using force to prevent any person from   
   trespassing on the dwelling-house or real property, or to remove a   
   trespasser therefrom, if he uses no more force than is necessary.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)