XPost: bc.politics, ont.politics, can.politics   
   XPost: ab.politics   
   From: weasel@stew.yum   
      
   On 3/31/2014 2:49 PM, {~_~} Раиса wrote:   
   > On 3/30/2014 6:23 PM, Chom Noamsky wrote:   
   >> Nope, onus is on both the transferee and the transferor.  If either   
   >> party violates the conditions then the offense is deemed "unauthorized   
   >> transfer of a firearm", punishable by up to 10 years imprisonment:   
   >   
   >   
   > WHO is going to catch "the transferee and the transferor" if they decide   
   > to just sell and buy without any kind of licence?   
   > Which one is going to turn the other one in?   
      
   And who was going to catch them when the LGR was active, hmmmm?   
      
   > Bloody idiot.  The above kind of 'reasoning'  is exactly what punctures   
   > holes in your tires.  And makes you gun loons exactly that.   
      
   Like I said before, you never think your theories through more than   
   superficially, or at all.  I can tell your job doesn't involve getting   
   paid to think.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)