XPost: bc.politics, can.politics, ont.politics   
   From: "@nyet.ca   
      
   On 5/28/2014 7:18 AM, KalElFan wrote:   
   > It's moronic, and just as unconstitutional though it'll probably   
   > take years to establish that.  In addition to the fallacy you've   
   > pointed out, Illegal Johns will also by definition be Criminal   
   > Johns, and Criminal Johns are more Dangerous Johns to the   
   > sex workers that the Supreme Court ruling said were being   
   > unconstitutionally prevented from safe working conditions.   
      
   'Bout time the tables were turned, eh, boy?  Not a squeak out of the   
   males of the population when it was the females accumulating criminal   
   records for prostitution.  Now that the shoe is on the other foot . . . .   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)