Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    mtl.general    |    Ahh Montreal, home of good strip joints    |    39,416 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 38,538 of 39,416    |
|    =?UTF-8?B?e35ffn3QoNCw0LjRgdCw?= <" to Roy    |
|    Re: Can you guess which federal institut    |
|    01 Jun 14 18:23:54    |
      XPost: can.politics, bc.politics, ab.politics       XPost: ont.politics, man.politics, sk.politics       From: "@nyet.ca              On 6/1/2014 11:06 AM, Roy wrote:       > Why are WE spending money in developing countries for THEIR people? Don't       they have governments? Why are we interfering in their AFFAIRS? I thought we       elected Harper et al to govern OUR nation...well when is he going to fix our       problems? So far he's        done little but travel over-seas and spend tax-payers dollars else-where.                     I wondered that many, many times over the years, but saw it explained       well in an article I read a few years back. The reasons why 'wealthier       countries' do it goes like this:              - When countries with huge populations are so impoverished that they       are NOT consumers for products through trade or imports, wealthier       governments 'give them a hand up'.              - The theory from those governments is this: If the people of those       countries (eg India, China, Bangladesh, Mexico) are able to earn enough       money to start becoming buyers/consumers, the wealthier countries have       found huge populations to which they can sell products.              - This is the kicker: the money which is used to 'develop' those       impoverished countries comes from the TAXPAYERS of developed countries,       via their governments' foreign aid programs.       Not from the corporations that will ultimately be making more and more       money as these huge populations become consumers of their goods.              In practice, developed countries use the monies they've taken from       taxpayers of their countries to open doors for their corporations to do       business in previously barren populations.              Now, in theory, this should work for the benefit of the country that is       sending foreign aid to countries that are potential buyers of goods and       services.       But in practice what has happened is that the corporations which now       have new customers for their goods, are not producing those goods in the       countries from which the money flowed.              They took their production plants and put them into the impoverished       countries - to save mega dollars on labour. And the huge savings they       achieved went into their own pockets - and those of shareholders, who       most often were not even citizens or residents of the country which sent       the foreign aid in the first place.              So, in summary, what has occurred is this: our governments have used us       taxpayers to open doors for corporations that in turn took their huge       profits and had very good lives for ever after.              And it could all have been so different if our governments were not just       corporate pawns and rightwing zealots. . . but governments which truly       cared about making lives better in other countries, but made sure the       corporations of our own countries employed our people - or paid a very       dear import fee for goods that were produced elsewhere.              That how I see it.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca