XPost: can.politics, bc.politics, ab.politics   
   XPost: ont.politics   
   From: "@nyet.ca   
      
   On 6/5/2014 7:15 PM, M.I.Wakefield wrote:   
   > Public Service Employment Act, Section 114   
   >   
   > (1) An employee may seek nomination as a candidate in a federal,   
   > provincial or territorial election before or during the election period   
   > only if the employee has requested and obtained permission from the   
   > Commission to do so.   
      
   Uhhh . . .  that would be to seek to be A CANDIDATE in an election   
   campaign, ya dumb rabbit.   
      
   > (2) An employee may, before the election period, be a candidate in a   
   > federal, provincial or territorial election only if the employee has   
   > requested and obtained permission from the Commission to do so.   
      
   Uhhh . . .  that would be to seek to be A CANDIDATE in an election   
   campaign, ya dumb rabbit.   
      
   > (3) An employee may, during the election period, be a candidate in a   
   > federal, provincial or territorial election only if the employee has   
   > requested and obtained a leave of absence without pay from the Commission.   
      
   Uhhh . . .  that would be to seek to be A CANDIDATE in an election   
   campaign, ya dumb rabbit.   
      
      
   > (4) The Commission may grant permission for the purpose of subsection   
   > (1) or (2) only if it is satisfied that the employee’s ability to   
   > perform his or her duties in a politically impartial manner will not be   
   > impaired or perceived to be impaired.   
      
   Uhhh . . .  that would be to seek to be A CANDIDATE in an election   
   campaign, ya dumb rabbit.   
   And only if they didn't take a leave of absence to conduct a campaign to   
   run in that election.   
   What kind of candidate would keep on working and try to run a campaign   
   at the same time?   
      
   > (5) The Commission may grant leave for the purpose of subsection (3)   
   > only if it is satisfied that being a candidate during the election   
   > period will not impair or be perceived as impairing the employee’s   
   > ability to perform his or her duties in a politically impartial manner.   
      
   See?   
      
   > (6) In deciding whether seeking nomination as, or being, a candidate   
   > will impair or be perceived as impairing the employee’s ability to   
   > perform his or her duties in a politically impartial manner, the   
   > Commission may take into consideration factors such as the nature of the   
   > election, the nature of the employee’s duties and the level and   
   > visibility of the employee’s position.   
      
   See?  Running as a candidate . . .   
      
   > (7) The Commission may make permission under subsection (4) conditional   
   > on the employee taking a leave of absence without pay for the period or   
   > any part of the period in which he or she seeks nomination as a   
   > candidate, or for the period or any part of the period in which he or   
   > she is a candidate before the election period, as the case may be.   
   >   
   > (8) An employee ceases to be an employee on the day he or she is   
   > declared elected in a federal, provincial or territorial election.   
      
   See?  Wins an election; no longer an employee in the old job.   
      
   What part of the shit you posted above limits this person from 'donating   
   to a party, carrying a party membership card, or sticking political   
   signs on the law', Dobranski?   
   You'd better start reading what you're posting, or risk losing your   
   credibility even further.  Pretty soon only Carr will be supporting your   
   stupid assertions.  And we all know his mental condition, don't we?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)