XPost: bc.politics, ont.politics, qc.politique   
   XPost: can.politics   
   From: stevet810@gmail.com   
      
   On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 01:16:37PM -0700, Alan Baker wrote:   
   > On 2014-07-22 20:03:37 +0000, Uncle Steve said:   
   >   
   > >On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 12:43:09PM -0700, Alan Baker wrote:   
   > >>On 2014-07-22 19:40:49 +0000, Uncle Steve said:   
   > >>   
   > >>>On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 12:33:38PM -0700, Alan Baker wrote:   
   > >>>>On 2014-07-22 19:30:16 +0000, (ಠ_ಠ)Раиса said:   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>>On 7/21/2014 8:35 PM, M.I.Wakefield wrote:   
   > >>>>>>"Alan Baker"  wrote in message news:lqkl69$5ml$1@news.datemas.de...   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>On 2014-07-22 02:09:59 +0000, (ಠ_ಠ)Раиса   
   > >>>>>>>said:   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>Snip!   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>But let's start out from accurate information.   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>Karen will need directions to there.   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>>Who's "Karen"?  Your fictitious nemesis?  I'll bet you had fictitious   
   > >>>>>friends when you were a kid.   
   > >>>>>No one else would play with you.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>You are "Karen", Karen.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>Happy to straighten that out for you.   
   > >>>   
   > >>>How?  By informing everyone that you're a pathological liar and a   
   > >>>bigot besides?   
   > >>   
   > >>How does anything I've ever said suggest I'm either of those?   
   > >   
   > >Why should I explain my reasoning to you when you would never do the   
   > >same (unless you were somehow compelled by an authority you could not   
   > >otherwise avoid)?   
   >   
   > Ducking?   
   >   
   > I understand.   
   >   
   > Writing why you won't explain is a lot easier than writing an explanation...   
   >   
   > ...when you don't really have one.   
      
   No, I'm explaining the concept of reciprocity.  You imagine I am   
   obligated to concede to you when all you do is take take take and   
   provide nothing in return except lies and insults.   
      
   What you're about is harassing certain individuals past the point of   
   tolerance, and no uncivlized amoral dirty trick is too illegal, too   
   immoral, or to extreme for your tastes.  You "win" when you've   
   provoked something actionable, but of course nothing of your behaviour   
   or actions will be allowed to be considered when that happens.  No   
   different from a corrupt pig who commits unprovoked violence against a   
   citizen and who then arrests that citizen if he dares to defend   
   himself.   
      
   Just another uncivlized piece of lying filth in the company of more   
   uncivilized filth infesting these newsgroups.  But oh, no, it's all in   
   my imagination and you could never be the corrupt, malicious fuck you   
   are in reality.   
      
      
      
   Regards,   
      
   Uncle Steve   
      
   --   
   Let me guess.  The voices in _your_ head tell you that you're   
   special/intelligent/chosen/whatever which makes the quality of _your_   
   delusions so much better than those reported by your garden-variety   
   mental patient.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)