XPost: bc.politics, ont.politics, qc.politique   
   XPost: can.politics   
   From: stevet810@gmail.com   
      
   On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 03:27:16PM -0700, Chom Noamsky wrote:   
   > On 7/22/2014 3:04 PM, Uncle Steve wrote:   
   > >On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 01:16:37PM -0700, Alan Baker wrote:   
   > >>On 2014-07-22 20:03:37 +0000, Uncle Steve said:   
   > >>   
   > >>>On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 12:43:09PM -0700, Alan Baker wrote:   
   > >>>>On 2014-07-22 19:40:49 +0000, Uncle Steve said:   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>>On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 12:33:38PM -0700, Alan Baker wrote:   
   > >>>>>>On 2014-07-22 19:30:16 +0000, (ಠ_ಠ)РаиÑ?а said:   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>On 7/21/2014 8:35 PM, M.I.Wakefield wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>"Alan Baker"  wrote in message news:lqkl69$5ml$1@news.datemas.de...   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>On 2014-07-22 02:09:59 +0000, (ಠ_ಠ)РаиÑ?а   
   > >>>>>>>>>said:   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>Snip!   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>But let's start out from accurate information.   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>Karen will need directions to there.   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>Who's "Karen"?  Your fictitious nemesis?  I'll bet you had fictitious   
   > >>>>>>>friends when you were a kid.   
   > >>>>>>>No one else would play with you.   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>You are "Karen", Karen.   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>Happy to straighten that out for you.   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>>How?  By informing everyone that you're a pathological liar and a   
   > >>>>>bigot besides?   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>How does anything I've ever said suggest I'm either of those?   
   > >>>   
   > >>>Why should I explain my reasoning to you when you would never do the   
   > >>>same (unless you were somehow compelled by an authority you could not   
   > >>>otherwise avoid)?   
   > >>   
   > >>Ducking?   
   > >>   
   > >>I understand.   
   > >>   
   > >>Writing why you won't explain is a lot easier than writing an   
   > >>explanation...   
   > >>   
   > >>...when you don't really have one.   
   > >   
   > >No, I'm explaining the concept of reciprocity.  You imagine I am   
   > >obligated to concede to you when all you do is take take take and   
   > >provide nothing in return except lies and insults.   
   > >   
   > >What you're about is harassing certain individuals past the point of   
   > >tolerance, and no uncivlized amoral dirty trick is too illegal, too   
   > >immoral, or to extreme for your tastes.  You "win" when you've   
   > >provoked something actionable, but of course nothing of your behaviour   
   > >or actions will be allowed to be considered when that happens.  No   
   > >different from a corrupt pig who commits unprovoked violence against a   
   > >citizen and who then arrests that citizen if he dares to defend   
   > >himself.   
   > >   
   > >Just another uncivlized piece of lying filth in the company of more   
   > >uncivilized filth infesting these newsgroups.  But oh, no, it's all in   
   > >my imagination and you could never be the corrupt, malicious fuck you   
   > >are in reality.   
   >   
   > Now, would you call that a rant or a rave?   
   >   
   > Holy doodle, somebody needs a Prozac.   
      
   There's your holy narrative.  What do you do when events and facts   
   interfere with your narrative?  You lie, distort, and ignore relevant   
   evidence.  After all, why should reality or mere facts interfere with   
   your political "needs"?  Especially when it is so lucrative to loot   
   from civilians and so satisfying to prove your inherent superiority by   
   proving you are exempt from mortal constraints such as the law.   
      
   Laws are for little people; ain't that so Mr. chompchompchomp?   
      
      
      
   Regards,   
      
   Uncle Steve   
      
   --   
   Let me guess.  The voices in _your_ head tell you that you're   
   special/intelligent/chosen/whatever which makes the quality of _your_   
   delusions so much better than those reported by your garden-variety   
   mental patient.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)