XPost: bc.politics, ont.politics, qc.politique   
   XPost: can.politics   
   From: stevet810@gmail.com   
      
   On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 04:26:27PM -0700, Chom Noamsky wrote:   
   > On 7/22/2014 3:43 PM, Uncle Steve wrote:   
   > >On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 03:27:16PM -0700, Chom Noamsky wrote:   
   > >>On 7/22/2014 3:04 PM, Uncle Steve wrote:   
   > >>>On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 01:16:37PM -0700, Alan Baker wrote:   
   > >>>>On 2014-07-22 20:03:37 +0000, Uncle Steve said:   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>>On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 12:43:09PM -0700, Alan Baker wrote:   
   > >>>>>>On 2014-07-22 19:40:49 +0000, Uncle Steve said:   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 12:33:38PM -0700, Alan Baker wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>On 2014-07-22 19:30:16 +0000, (ಠ_ಠ)РаиÑ?а said:   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>On 7/21/2014 8:35 PM, M.I.Wakefield wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>"Alan Baker"  wrote in message   
   > >>>>>>>>>>news:lqkl69$5ml$1@news.datemas.de...   
   > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>On 2014-07-22 02:09:59 +0000, (ಠ_ಠ)РаиÑ?а   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>said:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>Snip!   
   > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>But let's start out from accurate information.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>Karen will need directions to there.   
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>Who's "Karen"?  Your fictitious nemesis?  I'll bet you had   
   > >>>>>>>>>fictitious   
   > >>>>>>>>>friends when you were a kid.   
   > >>>>>>>>>No one else would play with you.   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>You are "Karen", Karen.   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>Happy to straighten that out for you.   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>How?  By informing everyone that you're a pathological liar and a   
   > >>>>>>>bigot besides?   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>How does anything I've ever said suggest I'm either of those?   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>>Why should I explain my reasoning to you when you would never do the   
   > >>>>>same (unless you were somehow compelled by an authority you could not   
   > >>>>>otherwise avoid)?   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>Ducking?   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>I understand.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>Writing why you won't explain is a lot easier than writing an   
   > >>>>explanation...   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>...when you don't really have one.   
   > >>>   
   > >>>No, I'm explaining the concept of reciprocity.  You imagine I am   
   > >>>obligated to concede to you when all you do is take take take and   
   > >>>provide nothing in return except lies and insults.   
   > >>>   
   > >>>What you're about is harassing certain individuals past the point of   
   > >>>tolerance, and no uncivlized amoral dirty trick is too illegal, too   
   > >>>immoral, or to extreme for your tastes.  You "win" when you've   
   > >>>provoked something actionable, but of course nothing of your behaviour   
   > >>>or actions will be allowed to be considered when that happens.  No   
   > >>>different from a corrupt pig who commits unprovoked violence against a   
   > >>>citizen and who then arrests that citizen if he dares to defend   
   > >>>himself.   
   > >>>   
   > >>>Just another uncivlized piece of lying filth in the company of more   
   > >>>uncivilized filth infesting these newsgroups.  But oh, no, it's all in   
   > >>>my imagination and you could never be the corrupt, malicious fuck you   
   > >>>are in reality.   
   > >>   
   > >>Now, would you call that a rant or a rave?   
   > >>   
   > >>Holy doodle, somebody needs a Prozac.   
   > >   
   > >There's your holy narrative.  What do you do when events and facts   
   > >interfere with your narrative?  You lie, distort, and ignore relevant   
   > >evidence.  After all, why should reality or mere facts interfere with   
   > >your political "needs"?  Especially when it is so lucrative to loot   
   > >from civilians and so satisfying to prove your inherent superiority by   
   > >proving you are exempt from mortal constraints such as the law.   
   > >   
   > >Laws are for little people; ain't that so Mr. chompchompchomp?   
   >   
   > Laws aren't always moral and ethical... so you're a legal positivist are ya!   
      
   You'll never admit to what I actually hold to be true.  It is much   
   more important for you to impose your "narrative" and the "facts" that   
   "support" it.   
      
   But you can have this one for free:  some laws are necessary for   
   civilization to succeed, particularly where corrupt filth like you are   
   to be found.  You like to pretend that you can be civilized and live   
   in a civlized society where you and yours are free from the   
   constraints of civilization.  You can't have it both ways, but then if   
   you loot and destroy the lives of mere mortals in your lawless fashion   
   it does not affect your enjoyment of the amenities of civilization,   
   now does it?   
      
   You'll never be immortal or all knowing, but if you conscientiously   
   ignore those two key facts and only abuse and attack those who are   
   denied any means to defend themselves, you can lie to yourself and   
   pretend you are God.  But it's odd how corrupt fucks like you mainly   
   express your illusory superiority through violence against the   
   defenseless.  Very much like child molesters, eh?   
      
   Quite a sizeable sick little "society" has accreted around values such   
   as those, and it's no surprise that your naive brainwashed progeny are   
   so thoughtless and quick to do so much of your dirty work.  By the   
   time they realize it is all a sham (if they ever do) they are bound to   
   your little "society" by their criminal guilt.  But as they can always   
   project their shame, weakness, and guilt to an external target, it all   
   works out.   
      
   Too bad all of Western society must pay the costs of your weakness and   
   immorality.  And there too, doesn't that remind you a bit of the way   
   much of the world had to pay for the excesses of the Germans during   
   World War II?  And look how well that worked out for the Germans of   
   that time.  Are they not admired for their success?   
      
      
      
   Regards,   
      
   Uncle Steve   
      
   --   
   Let me guess.  The voices in _your_ head tell you that you're   
   special/intelligent/chosen/whatever which makes the quality of _your_   
   delusions so much better than those reported by your garden-variety   
   mental patient.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)