Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    mtl.general    |    Ahh Montreal, home of good strip joints    |    39,416 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 38,850 of 39,416    |
|    =?UTF-8?B?IijgsqBf4LKgKSAgICAgICAgI to All    |
|    Temporary foreign worker program reveals    |
|    26 Sep 14 13:41:51    |
      XPost: can.politics, bc.politics, ab.politics       XPost: ont.politics, sk.politics, man.politics       From: Panca@nyet.ca              Sounds like more 'planning' and 'proposals' and 'reviewing' to delay the       implementation of new regulations for the damaging Temporary Foreign Worker       program.       After all, no companies have benefited from it more than those in the Alberta       region of the tarsands. And across the country, in low or minimum-wage jobs       that sustained the youth in our country. Watch this government stretch out       their 'planning' right through to the next election - while foreign workers       continue to work at Canadian jobs.       _________________________________________________       — CP — Sep 25 2014                     Feds aim to get tougher on TFW violators                     OTTAWA - The federal government is considering lifetime bans and heftier fines       on employers found to have violated its new regulations on temporary foreign       workers.              In a discussion paper posted overnight on the Employment and Social Development       website, the government proposes permanent bans in addition to expanding       penalties to include one-, five- and 10-year moratoriums that would forbid       businesses from applying for temporary foreign workers.              Currently there are only two-year bans imposed on companies that have broken       the rules.              The names of the banned employers would be made public, the proposals state.       There are currently four companies listed on the government's so-called TFW       public blacklist, with no new additions since early June, three weeks before       Employment Minister Jason Kenney unveiled his crackdown on the program.              In efforts to deliver on that overhaul, the feds are also now proposing minimum       fines of $500 to a maximum of $100,000 for serious violations — in particular       those that have resulted in a significant financial benefit to an employer.              The length of the ban would depend upon the type of violation, the employer's       history of compliance, the severity of the violation and the size of the       business, the paper states.              The government is asking stakeholders for their input into the proposals. The       deadline for submissions is Oct. 16.              Stakeholders and critics say they're puzzled by the proposals, wondering why       the government hasn't been taking such measures for years.              "This is the kind of thing they should have been doing right from the start,"       said Dan Kelly, head of the Canadian Federation of Independent Business.              "My hope is that if they go down this road, maybe they can unwind some of the       terrible reforms that they made in the summer that are unfairly penalizing       companies that haven't done anything wrong."              The overhaul, Kelly added, continues to target the restaurant sector. He says       12 fast-food restaurant proposals were recently shelved in Alberta due to the       province's labour shortage.              "So we're missing out on economic development, we're losing out on growth and       growing our tax base as a result of these heavy-handed changes."              Western premiers, including Alberta's newly elected Jim Prentice, have       complained that the government's overhaul has been too onerous. Prentice is a       former federal cabinet colleague of Kenney's.              The western leaders say their provinces are grappling with low unemployment       rates and facing genuine shortages of skilled labour, requiring temporary       foreign workers to fill the void.              Jinny Sims, the NDP's employment critic, also questioned why the government       hadn't been imposing such penalties for years. She also raised concerns about       enforcing the tougher rules.              "Despite their grand claims of reform, this paper reveals how pitifully little       the Conservatives have actually done to fix the program," she said.              "The sanctions also depend on catching violators, and the discussion paper says       not all inspections will involve a site visit, so once again they're going to       rely on paperwork .... how do you judge from a piece of paper? It makes no       sense."              The government is also proposing penalizing employers even if their failure to       comply was unintentional — for example, an accounting error that results in a       temporary foreign worker being underpaid.              The feds say they'll want to start assessing the circumstances surrounding a       company's non-compliance when determining the amount of the fine or the length       of the ban "so there is still an incentive for the employer to take corrective       action."              "Right now, if an employer is caught withholding wages, they can quickly pay       the worker and get away with it," Sims said. "Why is the government only trying       to crack down on this practice now?"       _______________________________________              Stop worrying about the pay for the temporary workers, Ms Sims . . . . start       talking about the lost jobs for Canadians because of the temporary workers in       this country.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca