Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    mtl.general    |    Ahh Montreal, home of good strip joints    |    39,416 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 38,977 of 39,416    |
|    =?UTF-8?B?IijgsqBf4LKgKSAi?= to All    |
|    Could have kept Aglukkaq at home and sav    |
|    06 Dec 14 16:22:47    |
      XPost: can.politics, bc.politics, ab.politics       XPost: ont.politics       From: Panca@nyet.ca              December 5, 2014 - Globe and Mail                     Canada /Harper government sticks to its line on the oil sands at UN climate       summit                     Aglukkaq heads to UN meeting defiantly backing Ottawa's stand on greenhouse-gas       emissions, even as the world sees us as laggards              Environment Minister Leona Aglukkaq heads to the United Nations climate summit       this weekend with no new targets and no commitment to action on Canada's       fastest growing source of greenhouse gases in the oil sands, but with a pledge       to crack down on a little-known chemical that represents a tiny portion of this       country's emissions. ^_^;              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^              Ms. Aglukkaq will join global environment ministers in Lima next week as       negotiators attempt to reach a draft agreement that would commit countries to       aggressive action on climate change, and provide poorer countries with       assistance to reduce emissions and adapt to the punishing weather conditions of       a warming planet.              On Friday, the minister announced that Ottawa will enact new regulations to       control hydrofluorocarbons, which are used in air conditioning and heating.       The powerful short-term greenhouse gases account for only 1 per cent of       Canada's overall emissions. But she reiterated that Ottawa will not move to       regulate emissions from the       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^       oil sands until the United States is ready to address its oil industry – a       decision that, according to many analysts, makes it virtually impossible for       Canada to hit its 2020 target.              While the United States, China and the European Union have announced new       emissions targets, the Canadian government faces mounting skepticism about its       commitment to meet 2020 targets, and is a long way from announcing its goals       for 2025 or 2030.              "What I can say now is that it is too early to give a definitive date and       target timelines," Ms. Aglukkaq said in an interview. "It is important to       remember that Canada's targets are national which means the provinces and       territories will have to play a role in that." She has convened a       federal-provincial-territorial meeting for late February to discuss new       post-2020 goals, though the United Nations has asked all countries to submit       their targets by the end of March.              The Conservative government insists it is committed to climate action. On       Friday, Ms. Aglukkaq highlighted past measures, including a 2012 rule to       'EVENTUALLY' phase out traditional coal-fired power, and new fuel mileage       standards for automobiles that were essentially set by Washington and agreed to       by Ottawa.              "We have taken decisive action," she said. "We were the first country in the       world to ban traditional coal-fired electricity. Our record speaks for itself:       we have reduced emissions in Canada without affecting the economy."               [This is the 'decisive action' she's fabricating . . .]        Under the new rules, companies will not be able to commence construction of a       new coal-fired power plant after July 1, 2015, <<===        UNLESS it is equipped with carbon-capture and storage (CCS) technology       that would bring greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) down to a level of       high-efficiency gas plants.              But she carries to Lima the perception of a government that is a laggard –       one       that is more interested in promoting exports of a high-carbon source of crude       oil than in pursuing a national plan to reduce emissions.              UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon this week challenged Canada to show leadership       on climate change in its role as a G7 nation. In an interview with the CBC, he       urged Ottawa "to become ambitious and visionary for the global future of people       and the planet."              NDP MP Peter Julian said Ottawa should be in a position to put forward       ambitious post-2020 targets.              "It shows shows the lack of seriousness of the Canadian government," he said.       "She is basically going to Lima empty-handed."              Ms. Aglukkaq rejected that characterization.              "Our government will continue to work constructively with our international       partners to establish a fair and effective international agreement that       includes all major emitters and we remain committed to that," she said.              "I would say they are showing up with another meaningless announcement," said       Dale Marshall of Toronto-based Environmental Defence. "What they need to be       regulating is the oil and gas sector which is the fastest growing source of       emissions in the country."              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca