Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    mtl.general    |    Ahh Montreal, home of good strip joints    |    39,416 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 39,209 of 39,416    |
|    Alan Baggett to All    |
|    Is a Canada Revenue Agency Landlord Avoi    |
|    11 Nov 15 03:51:07    |
      From: canadarevenue.agency@hotmail.com              Is a Canada Revenue Agency Landlord Avoiding Taxes Via Offshore Havens? : CRA       SOTW              By Bruce Livesey in News | October 15th 2015              The Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) rents office space from a Vancouver-based       property developer - a company that exploits offshore tax havens in       Liechtenstein, the British Virgin Islands and Channel Islands.              Larco Investments Ltd. owns three buildings in Montreal, Calgary and Edmonton       where they rent office space to the CRA. Larco purchased the buildings from       the federal government in 2007.              Yet evidence has emerged that Larco takes advantage of offshore tax havens.       "It's interesting to us that as a government landlord, that's also the       landlord of the CRA, when the CRA is supposed to be going after this       (offshore) stuff... it just raises questions about whether the CRA is aware,"       says Michelle Travis, research co-       ordinator of UNITE HERE Canada, a retail sector union which represents workers       employed by Larco.              UNITE HERE stumbled upon Larco's use of offshore tax havens while researching       the company.              The Larco-CRA case is symbolic of the Harper government's track record of       allowing billions of dollars of potentially taxable corporate monies to flee       to offshore tax havens. In 1990, only $11-billion was flowing from Canadian       corporations to offshore        tax havens: today this sum is almost $200-billion a year and growing. An       estimated $8-billion is also lost annually through tax evasion.              These sums suggest that if the Harper government was more diligent in tracking       offshore money or plugging holes in the tax code, they would not have to run       deficits, impose austerity measures, raid the EI surplus or sell its shares in       General Motors --        while also funding health care, education and infrastructure.              "It's a horrendous problem," says Senator Percy Downe, Jean Chrétien's former       chief of staff, who has spent the past nine years pursuing the offshore tax       haven issue. "If we collected what we're owed to the government... there'd be       additional money to        fund programs that are being cut. And taxes could be lower or remain lower."              In fact, Alain Deneault, a sociologist at the Université du Québec and author       of the recent book Canada: A New Tax Haven, maintains "[The Conservatives] are       offshore-friendly actually. They don't see it as something wrong officially."              Lalji family and their offshore tax structures              Larco is a privately-held company owned by the Lalji family, one of Canada's       wealthiest clans, sitting on a fortune estimated at $2.6-billion. Run by three       brothers - Amin, Mansoor and Shiraz - the Laljis are Ismaili Muslims who fled       Uganda in the 1970s        during the dictatorship of Idi Amin, settling in BC. There they founded a       burgeoning real estate empire, owning hotels and retail outlets such as the       Park Royal Shopping Centre in West Vancouver.              The Laljis are notoriously private and media shy - the Globe and Mail's       business magazine once listed them among Canada's "hermit kings" - although       they haven't escaped controversy entirely.              In 2007, Shiraz Lalji was criticized for destroying one of architect Arthur       Erickson's earliest single-family dwellings in BC - the David Graham house.       "We were upset," says Philip Boname, president of the Arthur Erickson       Foundation, who said Shiraz        never responded to appeals to change his mind.              In 2007, the Laljis paid $1.4-billion to buy seven federal buildings the       Harper government had put up for sale - and then rented them back to the       government with 25-year leases. The CRA has offices in three of the buildings.              By then, though, the Laljis had been using offshore tax havens for years. In       2003, Larco appeared before two Nevada gaming agencies when it wanted to       change its financial arrangement with one of the casinos it owns in Las Vegas.       The Nevada authorities        wanted more information about who exactly controlled the casino.              At hearings in Carson City, Nevada, Thad Alston, Larco's senior        ice-president, gave an explanation, noting that "this [corporate] structure       was created really with legal, tax and estate planning considerations for the       Lalji family."       The structure is complex: The Laljis had created a company called Hotspur       Resorts Nevada Inc. to bid for casino assets in Nevada. Hotspur's ownership       was structured through a series of offshore companies based in the British       Virgin Islands, a notorious        offshore tax haven.              The chain ended with a foundation called Hilfreich Stiftung located in       Liechtenstein, the tiny European offshore tax haven. Also involved was the       Lalji Family Trust, and the HSBC bank, a British global banking giant.              While it's not illegal to park money offshore as long as you declare it to the       CRA, these offshore havens are used because they charge little to no taxes for       companies and wealthy families - which is why the money is deposited there.       "There are so many        loopholes available to companies that companies can do it legally," says       Dennis Howlett, executive director of Canadians for Tax Fairness, which       lobbies against the use of such havens. "Unless you really flagrantly violate       the laws, the CRA doesn't have        time or money to come after you."              In his 2003 testimony, Alston indicated that the ultimate control of the       family's companies was held by the Lalji Family Trust. He said the trust was       scheduled to be dissolved in 2005, whereby the Laljis would have to pay taxes       to the CRA.              Thus, Alston said they decided to move some of this money offshore before 2005       "for estate planning and tax efficiency purposes, with the idea that you'd end       up with a sum of funds offshore in a tax-free jurisdiction with the idea that       with the funds        under the control of essentially a bank, trust company, you would then have a       way to manage those assets, those funds for the benefit of the families (for)       generations to come. So that was the idea."              He indicated that the sums moved offshore amounted to between $300-million and       $500-million.              Ultimately, the offshore funds were managed by Hilfreich Stiftung, the       Liechtenstein-based foundation created by the Laljis, which in turn was       overseen by HSBC - a bank notorious for its offshore tax haven shenanigans.       Media exposés earlier this year        revealed how the bank's Swiss arm helped wealthy customers dodge taxes and       conceal tens of millions in assets.                     [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca