Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    mtl.general    |    Ahh Montreal, home of good strip joints    |    39,416 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 39,269 of 39,416    |
|    Alan Baggett to All    |
|    =?UTF-8?Q?Canada_Revenue_Agency_has_doub    |
|    06 Jul 16 02:59:25    |
      From: canada.revenue.agency@hotmail.com               Canada Revenue Agency has double standard for ‘tax cheats’: CRA SOTW              The CRA won’t divulge the identities of people convicted for stashing       millions offshore, but it names and shames those caught owing small amounts of       tax.              By Marco Chown OvedForeign Affairs Reporter              The Canada Revenue Agency claims at least nine people have been convicted of       offshore tax evasion over the last two years, receiving $4 million in fines       and 84 months of jail time, but it is keeping the names of these tax cheats       secret.              Yet there are dozens of people — carpenters, hairdressers, farmers,       plumbers, foresters, realtors, architects — who are named and shamed on the       CRA’s website for not paying small amounts of tax.              This double standard means that small business owners who fall behind on tax       payments, or servers who don’t declare their tips, are publicly outed for       their relatively paltry offences, while wealthy individuals and businesses       caught hiding millions in        offshore tax havens are guaranteed anonymity.              Even though criminal convictions for tax evasion should be public information,       without the defendants’ names, case numbers or knowledge of which courthouse       the convictions were handed down in, it’s impossible to determine the       identities of offshore        tax cheats.              In the wake of the Panama Papers revelations, Ottawa pledged $444 million over       five years to crack down on tax cheats and said it will focus on those who use       offshore tax havens. But in several high-profile cases of offshore tax evasion       that have emerged        over the last year, including one scheme in which KPMG helped wealthy clients       hide $130 million in the Isle of Man, the perpetrators remain unnamed.               “Although the CRA can provide aggregate statistics on the convictions with       links to money or assets held offshore, we are not able to give the names and       case numbers of the people convicted as this may contravene taxpayer       confidentiality,” wrote CRA        spokesperson David Walters in an email to the Star.              “The details that we are able to include in our conviction news releases is       limited to what is presented in the courts and part of the public record. As a       result, if the public record does not include information linking the       convicted taxpayer to money        and assets located offshore, we are not able to report this information,” he       wrote.              In April, the federal anti-money-laundering agency, Fintrac, fined a bank $1.1       million for failing to report a suspicious transaction, but refused to name       the institution.               “It’s outrageous,” said NDP MP Murray Rankin. “All the CRA wants to do       is go after big penalties for the hairdresser who wrote off more than she       should.”              The former revenue critic says the policy contributes to the development of a       two-tier tax system.               “The people who have the ability to arrange their affairs using tax havens       tend to be large family trusts, corporations and the like, whereas the       government goes after little people to collect their taxes very        ggressively,” he said.              While the CRA will not divulge the identities of people caught stashing       millions overseas, it has no problem naming people who were charged for owing       small amounts of tax.               In January, the agency posted a news release on its website naming eight       Ontarians and two businesses that were fined between $1,000 and $8,000 after       they were “convicted and sentenced for failing to file corporate, personal       and/or GST/HST returns.”              One of those people is Dragan Micanovic, a 59-year-old cabinetmaker from       Etobicoke, who was fined $2,000 for failing to file tax returns. His company,       CIC Fine Woodworking & General Contracting Ltd., was also fined $2,000.              Micanovic, who fled war-torn Bosnia with his wife and two small children in       the late 1990s, arrived in Canada “with nothing,” he said, and built his       business from scratch.       “It’s not fair,” said the silver-haired craftsman as he stood on a       carpet of sawdust in his Mississauga workshop. “It’s very hard for the       little people.”              “Last year, the CRA froze my account. They took money. I lost insurance,”       he said. “I say: ‘If you freeze my account, how can I work? How can I pay       tax?’ ”              For years, Micanovic’s bread and butter has been replacing kitchens in       rental apartments, he said, explaining that each building brought him about 10       kitchens a year. But when he lost his contract with a major landlord, he said       he no longer had regular        income and was owed $120,000 for work he’d already done.              “I lose business and I don’t know what to do,” he said. “The bank       don’t want to help you. Nobody help you.”              “Big companies, Bell, Rogers, if I don’t pay my bill, they cut off the       phone. But if my client doesn’t pay, what can I do but cry?”              Desperate to make ends meet, Micanovic took out lines of credit and maxed out       his credit cards in order make mortgage payments, pay rent on his workshop and       support his daughter’s university education.               “I have enough for rent, but no money to live,” he said.               Micanovic moved to a workshop with cheaper rent and even shut down his       business in an effort to put the debts behind him. But soon the CRA started       calling.              “They no stop calling you,” he said. “I stopped answering the phone.”              He filed five years of tax returns for his now defunct business, but that did       little to dissuade the CRA.              “My bookkeeper sent them everything. He put zeros everywhere, but they still       want money. They push you, push you, push you. I don’t get paid for three       months, they don’t care. And they no try to help you. That’s the       problem.”              “If you have no money, they charge you interest. And it goes on and on. It       never ends.”       Beyond keeping them anonymous, some critics say the CRA is misleading the       public about the number of prosecutions of offshore tax cheats.              Queen’s University tax law Prof. Arthur Cockfield questions the CRA’s       claims to have convicted any real offshore tax evaders.               “I can’t find any successful prosecutions,” he said. “I’ve had       researchers look.”              If the government doesn’t publicize the names of convicted offshore tax       cheats, there’s no deterrence for others who might go down the same path,       Cockfield said.              “If you want to deter criminals, convict them,” he said.                     [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca