Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 156  |
|  Oli to Charles Stephenson  |
|  Maximus for Linux?  |
|  29 May 20 10:03:42  |
 MSGID: 2:280/464.47 5ed0c1dc REPLY: 52.fidonet_muffin@1:226/17 23358efd PID: JamNNTPd/Linux 1 CHRS: LATIN-1 2 TZUTC: 0200 TID: CrashMail II/Linux 1.7 Charles wrote (2020-05-28): CS> Hello all, CS> I've seen the Maximus source floating around. I'm not a programmer. I was CS> wondering if anyone compiled it under Linux, or if that source could be CS> compiled under linux? I'm not a C(++) programmer and I don't know nothing about the different versions and how to port to newer compilers. I somehow managed to get Squish build with trial and error and it seems to work fine. I also see that the max binary was build too, but I'm pretty sure I just changed stuff until it compiled and didn't care at all about correctness. I don't remember if I tried to install and run it, I was mainly interested in Squish. This was done on a 32-bit Raspberry. I think I tried it on a 64-bit machine and it didn't compile at all (but maybe it was caused by something else). My gut feeling is that an experienced C coder could fix the warnings and errors easily. Or maybe it just needs the right compiler flag? E.g. Maximus defines it's own nullptr which is later introduced by C++11 (in 2011). Squish and Max is still nice software and it's a bummer that there is no easy way to run it on Linux. There is an open issue on github: https://github.com/sdudley/maximus/issues/1 I can send you the diff if you want to try to compile it, but as I wrote, I don't think my changes are proper fixes and it would be better if someone who knows C++ would fix it. --- * Origin: (2:280/464.47) SEEN-BY: 1/123 18/200 90/1 103/705 120/340 601 123/131 203/0 221/0 SEEN-BY: 226/30 227/114 702 229/101 424 426 452 664 1014 240/2100 SEEN-BY: 240/5138 5832 5853 249/206 317 400 280/464 5003 292/854 8125 SEEN-BY: 310/31 317/3 320/219 322/757 342/200 396/45 423/120 633/280 SEEN-BY: 712/848 770/1 2432/390 2452/250 2454/119 PATH: 280/464 240/5832 229/426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]