TZUTC: -0700
MSGID: 2670.music@1:103/705 25a38150
REPLY: 2:221/1.58@fidonet f4270932
PID: Synchronet 3.19a-Linux master/3313031a7 Aug  9 2021 GCC 8.3.0
TID: SBBSecho 3.14-Linux master/3313031a7 Aug  9 2021 GCC 8.3.0
BBSID: VERT
CHRS: UTF-8 4

> Hello Erich B.!

> ** On Thursday 02.09.21 - 06:44, Erich B. wrote to All:

> I'm not into club/pop/dance music myself (anymore).  [I *did*  
> enjoy the odd beat-based repetative sequence briefly when I  
> *did* go to some dance clubs or house parties waaaaay back in  
> the day]

> No doubt, the Gaga persona is very talented and knows how to  
> control her voice and stay in key. But most of her appeal  
> requires the visual theatrical element too to draw attention  
> (albiet distracting from the strange lyrics at the same time.).  
>  To me, she can't seem to sing many songs independent of fancy  
> studio techniques and remain interesting enough that bear  
> repeat listens. Most of her songs seem to have a gimmick to  
> draw attention. When she gets loud, her voice sounds screetchy  
> to me.  I thought the pair-up with Tony Bennett could work..  
> but I don't think she's worthy of the blues or crooning style  
> for the long term.

> She seems to do the visual + pop/dance/club style well.
> --
>   ../|ug

> --- OpenXP 5.0.50
>  * Origin: Got mobile? Join MUSIC = https://tinyurl.com/yxptapwv (2:221/1.58)


She claims to be the next Madonna. Which Madonna wants to be like the next Lady
Gaga.

$ The Millionaire $
--- SBBSecho 3.14-Linux
 * Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)
SEEN-BY: 1/123 90/1 103/705 105/81 120/340 123/120 131 124/5016 129/305
SEEN-BY: 153/250 757 203/0 218/700 840 220/70 221/0 226/17 30 227/702
SEEN-BY: 229/101 424 426 428 664 700 249/307 400 250/5 8 261/38 267/800
SEEN-BY: 280/464 5003 282/1038 292/854 298/25 301/1 305/3 317/3 322/757
SEEN-BY: 340/1000 396/45 423/120 460/58 712/848 770/1 100 340 772/210
SEEN-BY: 772/220 230 2452/250
PATH: 103/705 280/464 770/1 317/3 229/426