MSGID: 2:221/1.58@fidonet f8031947
REPLY: 2:280/464 61d0abe5
PID: OpenXP/5.0.51 (Win32)
CHRS: ASCII 1
TZUTC: -0500
Hello Wilfred!

** On Saturday 01.01.22 - 20:30, you wrote to me:

 AA>> I only mentioned it because it too operates XP, and seems
 AA>> perfectly fine with AppleLossless versions.

 WvV> I don't know about AppleLossLess, and how it compares to
 WvV> Flac.

And I only mentioned it because I find iTunes (as a local  
program) operates very nicely as a music database.  I didn't  
want to mess around with transferring/importing my all my music  
files and relearn yet-another music program when iTunes is  
pretty darn good at what it does. It even supports streaming  
files across a LAN to another pc that has iTunes.

 AA>> ..The fellow has a fine hifi system. He found no
 AA>> discernable differences.

 WvV> There shouldn't be any difference. They all produce the
 WvV> same bytes that go into your DA converter for playback.

Short of hooking up a scope and/or other measuring devices, our  
audio tests were very specific.  We tested recordings with  
quiet passages, and specific recordings that featured super low  
pipe-organ notes.  They all seemed to reproduce in FLAC and  
AppleLossless equally well.
--
  ../|ug

--- OpenXP 5.0.51
 * Origin: Got mobile? Join MUSIC = https://tinyurl.com/yxptapwv (2:221/1.58)
SEEN-BY: 1/123 15/0 90/1 103/705 105/81 120/340 123/120 131 124/5016
SEEN-BY: 129/305 153/250 757 7715 203/0 218/840 220/70 221/1 6 360
SEEN-BY: 226/17 30 229/424 426 428 664 700 249/307 400 250/5 8 261/38
SEEN-BY: 267/800 280/464 5003 282/1038 292/854 298/25 301/1 305/3
SEEN-BY: 317/3 320/219 322/757 341/234 396/45 423/81 120 460/58 712/848
SEEN-BY: 770/1 100 340 772/210 220 230 2320/105 2452/250
PATH: 221/1 280/464 770/1 317/3 229/426