Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 15729  |
|  Dan Clough to Alexander Grotewohl  |
|  Re: Windows to Linux  |
|  07 May 24 21:59:00  |
 
TZUTC: -0500
MSGID: 4312.fido_mystic@1:135/115 2aa03294
REPLY: 1:120/616 4252ed5f
PID: Synchronet 3.20a-Linux master/acc19483f Apr 26 202 GCC 11.2.0
TID: SBBSecho 3.20-Linux master/acc19483f Apr 26 2024 23:04 GCC 11.2.0
BBSID: PALANTIR
CHRS: CP437 2
-=> Alexander Grotewohl wrote to Dan Clough <=-
AG> On 06 May 2024, Dan Clough said the following...
DC> Anyone asking a question like that would deserve to get flamed. Not in
DC> a million years would I ask that question. It would be "for Slackware
DC> 15.0", or perhaps "Slackware-current". No real Slacker would ask such a
DC> stupid thing.
AG> instead of attacking the point ("slackware as you use it refers
AG> to both slackware-current AND slackware-stable") you attack the
AG> example used to make the point.
Wrong, dipshit. You make an ASSUMPTION as to HOW I used the term
Slackware, and you were wrong. When I say Slackware, I mean a release
version of Slackware (most likely 15.0). If I wanted to reference
-current, I would say that.
DC> I won't quibble over what "small" and "lot" mean. However many there
DC> are, there are *FAR* more using a release version.
AG> goalpost moving
Strike two. Not goalpost moving, just trying to clarify your usage of
vague terms. But you don't want to clarify that, because then your
"argument" fails.
DC> But what would I know? I've only been using it for 26 years.
|
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]