Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    nyc.politics    |    Politics specific to New York City    |    92,004 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 90,074 of 92,004    |
|    Gene Poole to All    |
|    Sneak Attack on Washington State (1/3)    |
|    12 Sep 18 05:30:06    |
      XPost: alt.politics.usa.constitution, alt.politics.guns, alt.california       XPost: sac.general       From: gp@dont-email.me              Did you know the Winchester 1903, a .22-caliber rifle that has a       10-round tube magazine, is a “semi-automatic assault rifle”? In       fact, every semi-automatic rifle is a “semi-automatic assault       rifle.” So says Michael Bloomberg, and he is poised to turn his       definition into law.               The gun-banner epithet “assault weapon” has always been a       deceit. Unlike other firearm terms—such as “handgun” or “bolt       action”—the phrase “assault weapon” has never had a fixed       meaning. Instead, the phrase is a euphemism for “as many       firearms as we can restrict, based on current political       conditions.” Back in 1989, then-Sen. Dennis DeConcini, D-Ariz.,       introduced an “assault weapons” bill to ban only nine specific       models of firearms. But that was what the prohibitionists call       “a good first step.” Now, Bloomberg and his allies are pushing       an “assault rifle” ballot initiative in Washington state that       would apply to every semi-automatic rifle in existence.              Bloomberg and his spokespeople claim to support the Second       Amendment, saying they simply oppose “assault weapons.” But then       they try to classify any semi-automatic rifle as an “assault       weapon,” regardless of caliber, magazine capacity or anything       else.              Gun-banners in nations such as Australia and Great Britain have       already succeeded in outlawing all semi-automatic long guns. In       the United States, a big step in that direction is this year’s       Washington state ballot measure 1639.              Bloomberg and his spokespeople claim to support the Second       Amendment, saying they simply oppose “assault weapons.” But then       they try to classify any semi-automatic rifle as an “assault       weapon,” regardless of caliber, magazine capacity or anything       else. Under Bloomberg’s proposed Washington law, semi-automatic       rifles or handguns of any type would be subjected to onerous new       restrictions and taxes, thus discouraging their possession and       lawful use.              One objective of the Bloomberg strategy is stigmatization of gun       owners. Maybe you just bought a Benelli R1, or your father gave       you his Ruger 10/22, or you cherish your great-grandfather’s       Remington 8. You, like all owners of semi-automatic rifles, are       being stigmatized as an “assault rifle” owner—the kind of person       who owns “weapons of war” that have no place in civil society.              This spring, Bloomberg organized rallies all over the country to       denounce people who own such “assault rifles.” The hatred was       palpable. Most of the people at those rallies knew almost       nothing about firearms, and Bloomberg’s employees worked hard to       make them loathe you because you own a “semi-automatic assault       rifle.”              The Washington state scheme provides context to Bloomberg’s       propaganda campaign, which employs boycotts, threats, libel and       mob hysteria against anyone having anything to do with what they       consider “assault rifles.”              Perhaps you thought that the hate groups were only talking about       AR-15s, Mini-14s or other firearms invented in the past six       decades. To the contrary—every semi-automatic rifle ever made,       going all the way back to the first Winchester in 1903, is an       “assault rifle,” according to Bloomberg. The kind of people who       hunt with them, collect them, sell them or make them are evil       people who worship guns and don’t care about children’s lives.       So say the mobs chanting the Bloomberg slogans. If the       Washington proposal passes in November, individuals who wish to       acquire a semi-automatic rifle will also have to waive the       confidentiality of their medical records. The act of applying to       purchase “shall constitute a waiver of confidentiality and       written request that the health care authority, mental health       institutions, and other health care facilities release, to an       inquiring court or law enforcement agency, information relevant       to the applicant’s eligibility to purchase.”              The Bloomberg groups pushing the defamatory initiative call       themselves “Safe Schools Safe Communities” and the “Alliance for       Gun Responsibility.” That’s like a group that wants to restrict       access to books calling itself the “Alliance for Literacy.” The       groups are funded by not only Bloomberg, but also by his       billionaire allies, including former Microsoft Corp. executive       Paul Allen.              Under the Bloomberg proposal, nobody, of any age, could ever       acquire a “semi-automatic assault rifle” (that is, any semi-       automatic rifle) without first passing a gun safety course, the       content of which would be controlled by the government. So if,       for example, you have been a certified hunter-safety instructor       for the last 25 years, that still isn’t good enough. You can’t       even borrow a semi-automatic rifle without first enrolling in       and passing the government-controlled class at least every five              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca